search for: lvelvindron

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lvelvindron".

Did you mean: velvindron
2018 Nov 14
2
different TLS protocols on different ports
...cipher_list = ... } } Postfix let me easily define different TLS protocols on different ports. For that it would be cool if dovecot could assist on such migrations, too. Andreas *) see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8314 as well as the draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lvelvindron-tls-for-email-02 to deprecate TLSv1.1
2018 Nov 14
0
different TLS protocols on different ports
...> > Postfix let me easily define different TLS protocols on different ports. > For that it would be cool if dovecot could assist on such migrations, too. > > Andreas > > *) see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8314 > as well as the draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lvelvindron-tls-for-email-02 to deprecate TLSv1.1
2018 Nov 14
3
different TLS protocols on different ports
Hello, I'm providing IMAP+Starttls on port 143 for users with legacy MUA. So I've to enable TLS1.0 up to TLS1.3 For IMAPS / port 993 I like to enable TLS1.2 and TLS1.3 only. Is this possible with dovecot-2.2.36 / how to setup this? Thanks for suggestions, Andreas
2017 Sep 24
3
DH Group Exchange Fallback
On 09/24/2017 12:21 AM, Mark D. Baushke wrote: > I suggest you upgrade to a more recent edition of the OpenSSH software. > The most recent release is OpenSSH 7.5 and OpenSSH 7.6 will be released > very soon. This problem is in v7.5 and v7.6. See dh.c:436. > OpenSSH 6.6 was first released on October 6, 2014. I brought up v6.6 to give an example that older clients wouldn't be
2017 Sep 25
4
DH Group Exchange Fallback
On 25 September 2017 at 02:32, Mark D. Baushke <mdb at juniper.net> wrote: > [+CC Loganaden Velvindron <logan at hackers.mu>] primary author of > the RFC 4419 refresh draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lvelvindron-curdle-dh-group-exchange/ ? Tangent: has any consideration been given to increasing the maximum allowed beyond 8192 bits (which is below the current NIST recommendation for 256 bits of security)? Last time I looked OpenSSL supported 10k bits out of the box so it probably wouldn't be hard to s...