Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lvelvindron".
Did you mean:
velvindron
2018 Nov 14
2
different TLS protocols on different ports
...cipher_list = ...
}
}
Postfix let me easily define different TLS protocols on different ports.
For that it would be cool if dovecot could assist on such migrations, too.
Andreas
*) see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8314
as well as the draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lvelvindron-tls-for-email-02 to deprecate TLSv1.1
2018 Nov 14
0
different TLS protocols on different ports
...>
> Postfix let me easily define different TLS protocols on different ports.
> For that it would be cool if dovecot could assist on such migrations, too.
>
> Andreas
>
> *) see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8314
> as well as the draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lvelvindron-tls-for-email-02 to deprecate TLSv1.1
2018 Nov 14
3
different TLS protocols on different ports
Hello,
I'm providing IMAP+Starttls on port 143 for users with legacy MUA. So I've to enable TLS1.0 up to TLS1.3
For IMAPS / port 993 I like to enable TLS1.2 and TLS1.3 only.
Is this possible with dovecot-2.2.36 / how to setup this?
Thanks for suggestions,
Andreas
2017 Sep 24
3
DH Group Exchange Fallback
On 09/24/2017 12:21 AM, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> I suggest you upgrade to a more recent edition of the OpenSSH software.
> The most recent release is OpenSSH 7.5 and OpenSSH 7.6 will be released
> very soon.
This problem is in v7.5 and v7.6. See dh.c:436.
> OpenSSH 6.6 was first released on October 6, 2014.
I brought up v6.6 to give an example that older clients wouldn't be
2017 Sep 25
4
DH Group Exchange Fallback
On 25 September 2017 at 02:32, Mark D. Baushke <mdb at juniper.net> wrote:
> [+CC Loganaden Velvindron <logan at hackers.mu>] primary author of
> the RFC 4419 refresh draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lvelvindron-curdle-dh-group-exchange/ ?
Tangent: has any consideration been given to increasing the maximum
allowed beyond 8192 bits (which is below the current NIST
recommendation for 256 bits of security)? Last time I looked OpenSSL
supported 10k bits out of the box so it probably wouldn't be hard to
s...