search for: lures

Hi Chris >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:23:53 -0500 (CDT) > >On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Henrik Bach wrote: > > > I got this error: > > ------------------------------- > > gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Target/X86' > > Building X86.td register information header with tblgen > > tblgen:

Might I suggest the following patch, because this issue has bite me too? You're lured in by the initial good results from the Andersens alias analysis, only to discover the bugs later on. Robert Zeh On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle

...Asterisk Proverb: Asterisk is like an onion with many, many layers. With 160+ applications and seemingly endless options a person just can't know it all. Often one needs a new way to manipulate calls, searches and discovers the solution, realizing it was in the code all along. Inevitability lures one to investigate, deeper understanding is accomplished, maybe even profound but never complete. As the layers of the Onion are peeled back, wear proudly the malodorous smell of knowledge that is Asterisk. JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses I have the Asterisk stink on me!

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Henrik Bach wrote: > I think I've found the error: > > The Buffer contains: include "../Target.td" and length is 23. > The file that tablegen is looking for is therefore: "../Target.td". > > However, in the assertion you assert an empty buffer and that is not what > you want, I suppose. If you change line 114 to != instead ==, then

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:39:23PM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > > The next problem, on my system (Interix - you remember - Hey, some > > LLVM program is working :O ), is however, that it cannot find the > > ../Target.td file. At the moment I see some more bugs luring ahead > > in the TableGen code. More on that later. > > I'm sure this is because you hacked the

On 07/11/2014 12:33 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Technical side note: > It turned out that the lseek(2) function of NetBSD does not work > with SEEK_END as expected from the manual. libburn had to resort > to a binary search with try-and-error to determine device sizes. > I did not check perl's sysseek() whether it suffers from the > lseek(2) shortcomming, but i would expect

FYI:, I'm fairly new to samba (a couple of months now), and have experimented - unsuccessfully - with getting it to work with clearcase. Does anyone have a how-to, or a list of gotcha's for setting up clearcase with samba? Thanks in advance for any information you can send me. Ozzie,

In usr/src/uts/common/xen/io/xnbu.c, function xnbu_cksum_from_peer() http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/xen/io/xnbu.c#110 we have this: if ((flags & NETTXF_csum_blank) != 0) { /* * The checksum is blank. We must fill it in here. */ mp = xnb_process_cksum_flags(xnbp, mp, 0);

On 07/10/2014 12:18 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: >> >> following is a series of patches derived from my proposed diff. >> Based on syslinux-6.03-pre1, but should also apply down to 4.xx. >> >> I hope to have imitated the changelog style sufficiently. >> Mine are a bit longer than usual with patches in the archive, i fear. > > Yes, they are long. > There

Hi, i wondered why our happy bug hunt about the uninitialized register did not pop up in Google during a search for recent mentionings of xorriso. Wasn't there a thread about google-invisibility a few months ago ? So i began to watch and made an experiment. Can it be that this HTML tag META NAME="robots" CONTENT="noindex,follow" in

On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > Hello, > > Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers > precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points > points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? Hi Max, I don't know the answer offhand but please keep in mind that the current andersen's pass has many

...hin a command prompt. I'm aware of possible UNC path problems, but even hiding the network neighbourhood and editing the registry to change the UNC paths to mapped drives representation didn't help... So, i'm at the end of my capabilities; i just want to be sure that no bigger problem lures here, waiting to bite me later (in other applications that word). Best regards, Peter

Hi, I've made a research about how to compare two regression line slopes (of y versus x for 2 groups, "group" being a factor ) using R. I knew the method based on the following statement : t = (b1 - b2) / sb1,b2 where b1 and b2 are the two slope coefficients and sb1,b2 the pooled standard error of the slope (b) which can be calculated in R this way: > df1 <-

I put some code in a before_save callback in the model file to alter some fields that have dependencies in the DB. I''d like to call a method in the controller file but I continually get undefined method errors. I have specified Controller::methodname as well to no avail. What am I missing? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

>Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 22:07:49 -0700 >To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com >From: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com> >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP / IAX over satellite > >[post re-ordered chronologically] > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com >>[mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman

On 1/5/06, David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: > > The lure of components is directly proportional with the pain of development. I''m not trying to be abrasive in any way but I''m curious if this attitude is related to the number of rails apps David maintains. No I don''t know how many login systems David maintains. I can understand avoiding components if a person only

Dear R help. I have a beginner's question to ask you. I faced a difficulty in getting rate of return for some target data. I finished data importing and some manipulations. but I have any idea after that. Anyone who answer this question? Thanks in advance Park H.J

If all ListenAddress lines in the sshd_config file specify a port, then the -p option to sshd is silently ignored: # cat test_sshd_config2 ListenAddress 0.0.0.0:22 ListenAddress 0.0.0.0:2222 # `pwd`/sshd -D -d -p 4411 -f test_sshd_config2 debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_4.2p1 debug1: private host key: #0 type 0 RSA1 debug1: read PEM private key done: type RSA debug1: private host key: #1 type 1

Hi, me: > >> I hope to have imitated the changelog style sufficiently. > >> Mine are a bit longer than usual with patches in the archive, i fear. Geert Stappers: > > Yes, they are long. H. Peter Anvin: > There seems to be no patch descriptions at all, which would really help > long-term maintainability. It is a mid-term while ago since i proposed these patches.

Hello, Does the LLVM Andersens alias analysis handle function pointers precisely? I ran it and it looks like it says every function points points to the universal set. Is this what I should expect? Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090826/ff8d6c78/attachment.html>