search for: lun1

...device sda: 41943040 512-byte hdwr sectors (21475 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 41943040 512-byte hdwr sectors (21475 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 Attached scsi disk sda at scsi3, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 scsi: host 3 channel 0 id 0 lun1 has a LUN larger than allowed by the host adapt er scsi: host 3 channel 0 id 0 lun2 has a LUN larger than allowed by the host adapt er scsi: host 3 channel 0 id 0 lun3 has a LUN larger than allowed by the host adapt er scsi: host 3 channel 0 id 0 lun4 has a LUN larger than allowed by the host adapt...

Hi all, Imagine the following situation, you have : - one ISCSI storage server providing : lun0 and lun1 - the lun0 and lun1 contains a standard installation of Fedora : VM1 and VM2 - the standards installations define two VG VolGroup00 ... We didn't define LogicalVolume on the node and we attached directly the iSCSI lun to the VM without making partition or LV in Ovirt. On the node that...

...NS. Now how would ZFS be used for the best performance? What I''m trying to ask is if you have 3 LUNS and you want to create a ZFS storage pool, would it be better to have a storage pool per LUN or combine the 3 LUNS as one big disks under ZFS and create 1 huge ZFS storage pool. Example: LUN1 200gb ZFS Storage Pool "pooldata1" LUN2 200gb ZFS Storage Pool "pooldata2" LUN3 200gb ZFS Storage Pool "pooldata3" or LUN 600gb ZFS Storage Pool "alldata" -- This messages posted from opensolaris.org

...e) - one headnode and one storage in each data center (Sorry for this ascii art :) ( Data Center 1) <--1km--> (Data Center 2) (primary) (backup) [Disk Array 1 with Raid CRTL] [Disk Array 2 with Raid CRTL] [ -- LUN1 16 TB -- ] [ -- LUN2 16 TB -- ] | \ / | | / \ | | / \ | [ FABRIC 1...

...ne script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w "%u" logon script = login.kix logon drive = E: domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=lun1,dc=kaindl,dc=com ldap delete dn = Yes ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap passwd sync = Yes ldap suffix = dc=lun1,dc=kaindl,dc=com ldap ssl = no ldap user suffix =...

Hi list, following (very strange) problem: An ordinary windows user has mapped a drive F: on \\LUN1\Programme (running samba-3.0.20b-3 debian). The program "F:\Network\PMail V3\Pegasus Mail\winpm-32.exe" is being started, this works. But after about 10 minutes, the same program start fails with "invalid path or filename". When accessing the F: drive via Windows-Explorer, t...

...wich moves from node to node in a case of failure. - Recommended scalable method for partition divition. - Directory Hashing(How it actually works the theory behind this), we see the wiki but we need to understand the theory to balance the directory structure. - Using some criteria ex Lun1(a-h users), Lun2(i-m users).... - Proxy or Director is a must for a Clustered Filsystem or for the solution of a user belonging to one server. - In case we use a Proxy with dovecot we know we can use it with IMAP/POP but are not sure for ManageSieve and more important for SMTP. The question...

...nd a sun STK 2540 FC array (8 disks SAS 146 GB, 1 raid controller). The server is attached to the array with a single 4 Gb Fibre Channel link. I want to make a mirror using ZFS with this array. I have created 2 volumes on the array in RAID0 (stripe of 128 KB) presented to the host with lun0 and lun1. So, on the host : bash-3.00# format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c1d0 <DEFAULT cyl 30397 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci-ide at 5/ide at 0/cmdk at 0,0 1. c2d0 <DEFAULT cyl 30397 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci-...

........................................................ [ACLs: 0] | | o- luns .......................................................................................................... [LUNs: 4] | | | o- lun0 ................................................................ [fileio/file1 (/tmp/lun1.img) (default_tg_pt_gp)] | | o- portals .................................................................................................... [Portals: 1] | | o- 0.0.0.0:3260 ..................................................................................................... [OK] | o- i...

........................ > [ACLs: 0] > | | o- luns .............................. > ............................................................................ > [LUNs: 4] > | | | o- lun0 .............................. > .................................. [fileio/file1 (/tmp/lun1.img) > (default_tg_pt_gp)] > | | o- portals .............................. > ...................................................................... > [Portals: 1] > | | o- 0.0.0.0:3260 .............................. > ........................................................

...NS. Now how would ZFS be used for the best performance? What I''m trying to ask is if you have 3 LUNS and you want to create a ZFS storage pool, would it be better to have a storage pool per LUN or combine the 3 LUNS as one big disks under ZFS and create 1 huge ZFS storage pool. Example: LUN1 200gb ZFS Storage Pool "pooldata1" LUN2 200gb ZFS Storage Pool "pooldata2" LUN3 200gb ZFS Storage Pool "pooldata3" or LUN 600gb ZFS Storage Pool "alldata" This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hello, I want to setup an opensolaris for centralized storage server, using ZFS as the underlying FS, on a RAID 10 SATA disks. I will export the storage blocks using ISCSI to RHEL 5 (less than 10 clients, and I will format the partition as EXT3) I want to ask... 1. Is this setup suitable for mission critical use now? 2. Can I use LVM with this setup? Currently we are using NFS as the

...................................... [8 Targets] o- naa.60014053fd613910 ............................... [naa.600140539e23ee71] | o- luns ........................................................... [4 LUNs] | o- lun0 ...................................... [rd_mcp/ramdisk5 (ramdisk)] | o- lun1 ..................................... [rd_mcp/ramdisk23 (ramdisk)] | o- lun2 ..................................... [rd_mcp/ramdisk24 (ramdisk)] | o- lun3 ..................................... [rd_mcp/ramdisk25 (ramdisk)] o- naa.60014058fd33725f ............................... [naa.6001405...

...................................... [8 Targets] o- naa.60014053fd613910 ............................... [naa.600140539e23ee71] | o- luns ........................................................... [4 LUNs] | o- lun0 ...................................... [rd_mcp/ramdisk5 (ramdisk)] | o- lun1 ..................................... [rd_mcp/ramdisk23 (ramdisk)] | o- lun2 ..................................... [rd_mcp/ramdisk24 (ramdisk)] | o- lun3 ..................................... [rd_mcp/ramdisk25 (ramdisk)] o- naa.60014058fd33725f ............................... [naa.6001405...

Hi list, )2nd try bcs. of missing attachements). Following (very strange) problem: An ordinary windows user has mapped a drive F: on \\LUN1\Programme (running samba-3.0.20b-3 debian). The program "F:\Network\PMail V3\Pegasus Mail\winpm-32.exe" is being started, this works. But after about 10 minutes, the same program start fails with "invalid path or filename". When accessing the F: drive via Windows-Explorer, the...