Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lukav".
Did you mean:
lukas
2020 Jul 27
3
SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes
...#39;t, then they in turn
could ask their connections and so on.
Anyway, since I've switch to zerotier I have no problems and so far it
works great.
Best Regards
>
> Regards,
> Borg
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
>
> From: Anton Avramov <SRS0=TSOC=AB=lukav.com=lukav at mijnuvt.nl>
> To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org
> Subject: SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:22:36 -0400
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a network with about ~800. The network is a mix of tinc 1.0 and
> 1.1 nodes. It is gradually expanding...
2020 Jul 28
0
SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes
...m.
You noticed it yourself, you had huge amount of edges and you probably
hit the limitation of tinc itself...
So, in zerotier all works fine? you still have flat (mesh)
network design? Or you redesigned network aswell?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Anton Avramov <SRS0=7cKF=BG=lukav.com=lukav at mijnuvt.nl>
To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org
Subject: Re: SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:35:21 -0400
Hi, thank for getting back.
I'll answer the questions, but I've already gave up on tinc and switch to
zerotier-one.
On 2020-07-27 5:10 p.m.,...
2020 Jul 27
0
SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes
...lot too (1.0) but my network is very segmented.
I use switch mode and handle routing myself, so mesh links arent large..
I would NOT go beyond 30 nodes for full auto-mesh.. its already like 435
edges...
Regards,
Borg
---------- Original message ----------
From: Anton Avramov <SRS0=TSOC=AB=lukav.com=lukav at mijnuvt.nl>
To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org
Subject: SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:22:36 -0400
Hi all,
I have a network with about ~800. The network is a mix of tinc 1.0 and
1.1 nodes. It is gradually expanding for several years now.
The problem i...
2020 Jun 19
2
SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes
....
However I get a segfault soon after starting on each node that I enable
that option.
I've build from the latest code and here is a trace of such a run: (this
is not from a "major" node, but the effect is the same)
Got ANS_KEY from Backbone (164.138.216.106 port 655): 16 Office
Lukav_Beast
52201D7CFDC2C7E1FD7871A36E651B7AC24A52B4ED892CD953397F6BA859AB22D5D4CB235B9CF85910B6BDE91A34C85E
427 672 4 0 94.155.19.130 13935
Using reflexive UDP address from Office: 94.155.19.130 port 13935
UDP address of Office set to 94.155.19.130 port 13935
Got REQ_KEY from Backbone (164.138.216.106...
2019 Feb 08
1
Mode: switch and DHCP problems on network with many nodes
Hi All,
I currently have the following setup.
One central node called BackBone with the following conf:
Name = Backbone
Mode = switch
AddressFamily = ipv4
ReplayWindow=64
Compression=10
I also have approximately 440 nodes connected to this node with the
following setup:
Name = xxxxxx
Mode = switch
ConnectTo = Backbone
Compression = 10
There is dnsmasq on Backbone that serves ips to the nodes