Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "lugaru".
Did you mean:
lugar
2019 Oct 25
5
ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
When I use "ls -al" on a directory, for files with only owner read/write
permission, the displayed attributes are "-rw-", not "-rw-------". That
means the file names don't line up with other files in the directory, which
makes the listing harder to read. What changed where and how do I fix that?
2019 Oct 26
0
ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 20:14, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote:
>
> Found it. It happens from the process buffer inside Lugaru Epsilon. I think
> ls thinks it's doing a DIRED output instead of a shell output. Now I need
> to figure out why it thinks that. This wasn't happening in CentOS 7.
>
Lugaru Epsilon? I think you need to give a lot more explanation on
what is going on because I (at least) have no id...
2019 Oct 26
2
ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
Found it. It happens from the process buffer inside Lugaru Epsilon. I think
ls thinks it's doing a DIRED output instead of a shell output. Now I need
to figure out why it thinks that. This wasn't happening in CentOS 7.
2006 Aug 06
10
editor recommendation
Hello lsit,
I''am new to rails (about 2 hours) and after the first lines of code
I must say: Great! I love it!
Can someone recommend me a editor? I run Ubuntu Dapper.
Th?ngs
--
Jochen Kaechelin, fvgi242ss, wlanhacking.de
http://mail.wlanhacking.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
http://www.gissmoh.de - Mein sonstiges Leben!!
2019 Oct 26
0
ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
--On Friday, October 25, 2019 6:13 PM -0700 Kenneth Porter
<shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote:
> Found it. It happens from the process buffer inside Lugaru Epsilon. I
> think ls thinks it's doing a DIRED output instead of a shell output. Now
> I need to figure out why it thinks that. This wasn't happening in CentOS
> 7.
I'm puzzled. I can't find anything in the Gnu coreutils manual to describe
this format. I do note that out...
2019 Oct 26
2
ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
It's not a ls bug. I've stepped through the code with gdb and it looks just
fine. At this point I think Epsilon (a 32-bit app) is corrupting the image
of its child process in a strange way. I'm working with the author at
Lugaru (who's very responsive) to track it down. He couldn't reproduce it
right away. I just reproduced it on a virgin CentOS 8 image at Linode with
utterly no modifications. I just spun up the VM, logged in, scp'd the
Epsilon RPM, dnf installed it, and demonstrated the issue.
I extracted...