search for: luga

...a > hammer - doesn't use that tool in the first place .... > > MfG, > Bernd that is pretty unrealistic and I don't agree with it anyway. Email should be intitive > -- > Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at > LUGA : http://www.luga.at -- So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998 http://www.mrbrklyn.com DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002 http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership D...

On 12/01/2018 05:49 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > * Michael A. Peters: > >> Netiquette posts are just someone's opinion, and they often don't take >> into account the vastly different way different types of minds work. > > Mailing list netiquette has been around for decades, for good reasons. > If Joe User's mind "works differently", Joe needs to

...or email e.g. the To:-header has no technical meaning. Let's hope that people who do not know how to use a tool - e.g. like a hammer - doesn't use that tool in the first place .... MfG, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at LUGA : http://www.luga.at

...to these email users > > without an @domain.com? Or maybe ignore them. Or drop them from the logging. It's not directly a solution within dovecot but "fail2ban" exists. MfG, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at LUGA : http://www.luga.at

Hi Claudio Corvino via dovecot, We have received your request and a ticket has been created with Ticket ID - 22073. A support representative will be reviewing your request and will contact you shortly. To view the status of the ticket or add comments, please visit? https://support.atomia.com/helpdesk/tickets/22073 Speak to you soon, Atomia Support Team

...in the "From", "Recipient", "Correspondents" and "Sender[@]" column only "dovecot at dovecot.org" which neither helpful nor correct. [...] Mfg, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at LUGA : http://www.luga.at

...cmp 3 13" delivers as the 1st link http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/icmp/msg3.htm and 13 seem to indicate "Communication Administratively Prohibited." Your turn;-) MfG, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at LUGA : http://www.luga.at

...sooner or later - end up in the databases of US-3-letter-organizations. So forget about GDPR compliance with such software providers. MfG, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at There is no cloud, just other people computers. - FSFE LUGA : http://www.luga.at

...t;<\/head>}' ---- snip ---- Caveat emptor: Untested! I know all that stuff about sed (GNU-sed and other sed's ..) ... MfG, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at There is no cloud, just other people computers. - FSFE LUGA : http://www.luga.at

On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:25, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote: > On 30/10/2020 17:11, @lbutlr wrote: > [...] >> echo $1 | sed -e '|</head>|<style>* {color:white !important; background-color: black !important; } </style></head>|' > > What should the sed stuff do? Changes </head> to <style>* {color:white

Hi, This might be a silly question: which would be the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++ storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for mkfs.ext4 called "news" with inode_ratio = 4096, and after formating the fs with that setting and then with the defautl setting I see this difference of space (wasted space, but more inodes): 4328633696

I am a newbie to dovecot but not postfix and centos I created a new VM with Centos 8 and installed dovecot and postfix.? Postfix is working fine but dovecot rejects connections from anything but the local machine. Locally ? Trying 10.10.100.157... ? Connected to 10.10.100.157. ? Escape character is '^]'. ? * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE

On 02/12/2018 11:00, Hendrik Boom wrote: > There's an extensive email etiquette post somewhere on the net > explaining why setting 'reply-to' to the list is a bad idea. Lots of posts around about this, all self serving :) There may of course be an RFC floating around, but I admit to never having bothered to look, because good netizens reply to list, lists are public, they

Someone I was speaking with this evening claimed they have installed the latest named rpms yet they are still getting exploited daily and being hacked. Do the latest rpm''s for the named 4.9.x stuff fix all the root exploits or is this person just an idiot who probably has holes elsewhere in the system?

> I want to have it case-insensitive again, like in Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 i would also plea for making it case-insensitive again! We were hit by this too, and I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! Sincerly, Klaus Steinberger -- Rechnerbetriebsgruppe / IT, Fakult?t f?r Physik Klaus Steinberger FAX: +49 89 28914280 Tel: +49 89 28914287 --------------

This is probably quite an easy question, but I haven't been able to find the answer. I'm running a server where all the email addresses are in the format "user at domain.com". I've noticed that a large number of fake login attempts use the format "user" eg. reception, service, root, admin. Is it possible to prevent any such logins to these email users without an

> On 30/10/2020 19:25 Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd at petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote: > > > On 30/10/2020 17:11, @lbutlr wrote: > [...] > > echo $1 | sed -e '|</head>|<style>* {color:white !important; background-color: black !important; } </style></head>|' > > What should the sed stuff do? > TTBOMK '|' is not known by sed ...

..., and if Windows does this, it would be possible for the server to take advantage of this. Finally, if the server can make this optimization, does a newer version of Samba (3.x or 4.x) do it? hp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer | If the code is old but the problem is new |_|_) | Sysadmin WSR / LUGA | then the code probably isn't the problem. | | | hjp@wsr.ac.at | __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Tim Bunce on dbi-users, 2004-11-05 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 388 bytes...

I have recently been working/testing with exchange 2016 and started thinking if I should even migrate to this platform. I assume more people here have experience with exchange and this idea. I was wondering if this is possible with a dovecot setup 1. public folder can be implemented with a public mailbox? 2. authorize users via groups access to mailboxes/folders of the public

Sorry, forgot to change the subject on my first posting. I was reading a comment this morning about something Microsoft had published to the effect that there were vendors guaranteeing 99.9% uptime for NT. The guy who wrote the reply did the math for what that means, and the results are very interesting. Quote below: OK, now what does a 99.9% uptime guarantee mean? Well, it means that at