search for: luffi

Hi All, I wanted know how to get RJSONIO output with out forward slashes? for example: "({\"total\":5,\"results\":[\n {\n \"id\": 1,\n\"name\": \"Monkey D Luffy\",\n\"position\": \"Captain\",\n\"ambition\": \"I Will become the pirate king\" \n},\n{\n \"id\": 2,\n\"name\":

Hi I have a distance matrix which is computed by user defined method. I would like to plot the dendrogram. I would like to use different color and want the leaves laying down bottom. The script like this. I am not familiar with R. I followed the example shown in http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats/html/dendrogram.html dist.obj <- as.dist(matrix.distance) hc.obj <-

Hi, I tried to use naivebayes in package 'e1071'. when I use following parameter, only one predictor, there is an error. > m<- naiveBayes(iris[,1], iris[,5]) > table(predict(m, iris[,1]), iris[,5]) Error in log(sapply(attribs, function(v) { : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function However, when I use two predictors, there is not error any more. > m<-

❦ 4 avril 2018 15:59 +0200, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> : >> I may have missed this suggestion. Maybe Dan only sent it to you? > > No, there is another thread where this issue is discussed: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-April/msg00190.html > > In the >> meantime, could I change the locks around virHashForEach() and similar

❦ 4 avril 2018 16:21 +0200, Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx> : >> You can do that locally, but as a patch it's very unlikely to be >> accepted upstream because we've introduced RW locks to be able to access >> domain list from multiple threads. > > Looking a bit more, the whole "iterating" bit is currently > unsafe. First, it is racy since

❦ 4 avril 2018 17:00 +0200, Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx> : >>> You can do that locally, but as a patch it's very unlikely to be >>> accepted upstream because we've introduced RW locks to be able to access >>> domain list from multiple threads. >> >> Looking a bit more, the whole "iterating" bit is currently >> unsafe.

Hi, I tried to use naivebayes in package 'e1071'. when I use following parameter, only one predictor, there is an error. > m <- naiveBayes(iris[,1], iris[,5]) > table(predict(m, iris[,1]), iris[,5]) Error in log(sapply(attribs, function(v) { : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function However, when I use two predictors, there is not error any more. > m <-

flight 17325 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17325/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 15 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-xl 15 guest-stop

flight 17454 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17454/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail

flight 17612 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17612/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail

flight 17901 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17901/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-pv 4

flight 17916 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17916/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 4

flight 18150 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18150/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as

flight 18181 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18181/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as

flight 18805 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18805/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as

flight 18844 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18844/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12557 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail

Hey! It seems that if I close a connection while a domain event callback is in progress, I can easily have a crash. Here is a backtrace: #v+ #0 virFree (ptrptr=0x0) at ../../../src/util/viralloc.c:582 save_errno = <optimized out> #1 0x00007fc8328a4ad2 in virObjectEventCallbackListPurgeMarked (cbList=0xadfc30) at ../../../src/conf/object_event.c:282 freecb = <optimized

❦ 5 avril 2018 17:00 +0200, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> : >> 0001-util-don-t-check-for-parallel-iteration-in-hash-rela.patch >> >> >> From 7bf32825325b124edce58687a8cd2ceff13328b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Vincent Bernat <vincent@bernat.im> >> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:25:37 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] util: don't check

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi ! /etc/init.d/xendomains and /etc/init.d/xend complain about xen-utils-version not existing any more instead of failing silently. The following patch fix this problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,

Hello ! I have started to use Sieve support in LDA. From the RFC a same message should not be delivered twice in the same folder : ,---- | 2.10.3. Message Uniqueness in a Mailbox | | | Implementations SHOULD NOT deliver a message to the same folder more | than once, even if a script explicitly asks for a message to be | written to a mailbox twice. | | The test for equality