search for: luca_ciciriello

..., 2012, at 10:06 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Luca, > > Don't use 'auto' in LLVM code for now. We still support building via some host compilers that don't support it. > > -Jim > > On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Luca Ciciriello <luca_ciciriello at hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All. >> >> In my C++ code I'm using the libc++ library and my question is about which construct is faster: >> >> for(auto line : lines) >> { >> ... >> } >> >> or >> >> for(auto...

Hi Luca, Don't use 'auto' in LLVM code for now. We still support building via some host compilers that don't support it. -Jim On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Luca Ciciriello <luca_ciciriello at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi All. > > In my C++ code I'm using the libc++ library and my question is about which construct is faster: > > for(auto line : lines) > { > ... > } > > or > > for(auto it = lines.begin(); it != lines.end(); it++) > { &gt...

...<grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi Luca, >> >> Don't use 'auto' in LLVM code for now. We still support building via some host compilers that don't support it. >> >> -Jim >> >> On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Luca Ciciriello <luca_ciciriello at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All. >>> >>> In my C++ code I'm using the libc++ library and my question is about which construct is faster: >>> >>> for(auto line : lines) >>> { >>> ... >>> } >>> &...

Hi All. In my C++ code I'm using the libc++ library and my question is about which construct is faster: for(auto line : lines) { ... } or for(auto it = lines.begin(); it != lines.end(); it++) { … } Thanks in advance for any answer. Luca.