Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "lto_module".
Did you mean:
lto_module_
2015 Jun 04
3
[LLVMdev] Updated RFC: ThinLTO Implementation Plan
...ementation. For users of the gold linker
> (which uses the LTOModule interfaces) this should make it much easier
> to enable ThinLTO (from my browsing of ld64 source, it looks like
> native-wrapped bitcode should be handled already there too due to the
> handling being hidden behind the lto_module API).
>
> Teresa
Quick question: Is the word required to support ThinLTO using llvm's
native tools orthogonal to that required to supporting non-llvm tools?
If not, would it make sense to start with a deployment of entirely LLVM
based tools - since there seems to be general interest i...
2015 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] Updated RFC: ThinLTO Implementation Plan
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at