Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lto_codegen_debug_opt".
2017 May 02
4
[LTO] -time-passes and libLTO
Hi,
We have been investigating an issue when running LTO with our proprietary
linker, which links against libLTO dynamically. The issue is that when we
pass -time-passes via the lto_codegen_debug_options function in the LTO C
API, no time information is produced during compilation. The reason for
this is that time information is stored in state owned by a ManagedStatic
instance, and is only printed when the state is destroyed. This in turn
only happens when ManagedStatics are cleaned up, via th...
2015 Jan 12
2
[LLVMdev] LTO support on Mac
...t on Mac.
>
>
> I am not sure if there is a supported way of passing extra llvm
> options during LTO with ld64.
You can pass options with -mllvm. But you need to get it to the linker, so when invoking the linker through clang it looks like:
-Wl,-llvm,-myltoopt
That will get it to lto_codegen_debug_options(). But I don’t know what options strings lto_codegen_debug_options() handles.
-Nick
2017 May 03
2
[LTO] -time-passes and libLTO
...May 2, 2017, at 08:31, James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have been investigating an issue when running LTO with our proprietary
> linker, which links against libLTO dynamically. The issue is that when we
> pass -time-passes via the lto_codegen_debug_options function in the LTO C
> API, no time information is produced during compilation. The reason for
> this is that time information is stored in state owned by a ManagedStatic
> instance, and is only printed when the state is destroyed. This in turn
> only happens when ManagedStatics ar...
2015 Jan 10
2
[LLVMdev] LTO support on Mac
Hi,
I'm building LLVM on Mac OS 10.10 and I'm having trouble making LTO work.
The system linker dumps the following information when I executed "ld -v"
@(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-241.9
configured to support archs: armv6 armv7 armv7s arm64 i386 x86_64 x86_64h
armv6m armv7m armv7em
LTO support using: LLVM version 3.4.2
which tells me that it is correctly pointing to the LLVM
2016 Sep 30
7
libLTO C API stability policy
Hi all,
libLTO is exposing a very “stable” (in the sense of immutable) C API to be used by linkers (and binutils tools) that manipulate bitcode (like when performing LTO).
I’m looking into relaxing the stability concern and design a policy for this API that would allow to deprecate and remove some the APIs exposed here. The MacOS linker (ld64) is one the users of libLTO, but there are others