search for: ltmp_2_5

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ltmp_2_5".

Did you mean: ltmp_2_2
2005 Apr 02
0
[LLVMdev] Running Pool Allocated programs
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Ricardo wrote: > Hello, > I am trying to run a program optimized with the Pool Allocation, but I am receiving this error: > > ==================== > > *** 4 DYNAMIC POOLS INITIALIZED *** > > *** 4 DYNAMIC POOLS ALLOCATED FROM *** > > MaxHeapSize = 0.062500KB HeapSizeAtExit = 0.062500KB NOTE: only valid if using > Heuristic=AllPools and no
2005 Apr 03
2
[LLVMdev] Running Pool Allocated programs
...ew = malloc ( sizeof ( struct list ) ); New->Next = Num ? makeList (Num-1) : 0; return New; } int main() { struct list *X = makeList(10); } ========================== After applying the PA to it, the output is something like this: ========================== int main(void) { signed char *ltmp_2_5; struct l_struct_2E_list *l6_tmp_2E_7_2E_i2; #if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__llvm__) #if defined(i386) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__i386) {short FPCW;__asm__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (*&FPCW)); FPCW=(FPCW&~0x300)|0x200;__asm__("fldcw %0" :: &quot...
2005 Apr 02
2
[LLVMdev] Running Pool Allocated programs
Hello, I am trying to run a program optimized with the Pool Allocation, but I am receiving this error: ==================== libpoolalloc.so: undefined symbol: _ZTIN4llvm16EquivClassGraphsE -load request ignored. *** 4 DYNAMIC POOLS INITIALIZED *** *** 4 DYNAMIC POOLS ALLOCATED FROM *** MaxHeapSize = 0.062500KB HeapSizeAtExit = 0.062500KB NOTE: only valid if using Heuristic=AllPools and no
2005 Apr 03
0
[LLVMdev] Running Pool Allocated programs
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Ricardo wrote: > After applying the PA to it, the output is something like this: ... > My question is: why is this malloc necessary? > ltmp_2_5 = malloc(4u); > Shouldn't be the result a program with this malloc replaced by poolalloc? > Should I include a special flag to achieve this? Ah, sorry, my memory was wrong. The default is to perform the "SelectivePA" optimization. Since pool allocation detected that there i...
2005 Apr 03
1
[LLVMdev] Running Pool Allocated programs
...- Do not pool allocate anything --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Ricardo wrote: > > After applying the PA to it, the output is something like this: > ... > > > My question is: why is this malloc necessary? > > ltmp_2_5 = malloc(4u); > > > Shouldn't be the result a program with this malloc replaced by poolalloc? > > Should I include a special flag to achieve this? > > Ah, sorry, my memory was wrong. The default is to perform the > "SelectivePA" optimization. Since pool al...