Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "ltmp12".
Did you mean:
ltmp1
2012 Mar 28
2
[LLVMdev] Suboptimal code due to excessive spilling
...oo(double *x, int *p, int k)
{
double s = 0.0;
for (int i = 0; i != k;++i)
{
s += sum(&x[i], 18);
p[i] = 5; // xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
}
return s;
}
====== Output A ======
======================
foo: # @foo
.Ltmp12:
.cfi_startproc
# BB#0:
pushl %ebx
.Ltmp13:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
pushl %edi
.Ltmp14:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 12
pushl %esi
.Ltmp15:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
subl $88, %esp
.Ltmp16:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 104
.Ltmp17:
.cfi_offset %esi, -16
.Ltmp18:
.cfi_offset %edi, -12
.Ltmp19:
.cfi_offset %ebx...
2012 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Suboptimal code due to excessive spilling
...oo(double *x, int *p, int k)
{
double s = 0.0;
for (int i = 0; i != k;++i)
{
s += sum(&x[i], 18);
p[i] = 5; // xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
}
return s;
}
====== Output A ======
======================
foo: # @foo
.Ltmp12:
.cfi_startproc
# BB#0:
pushl %ebx
.Ltmp13:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
pushl %edi
.Ltmp14:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 12
pushl %esi
.Ltmp15:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
subl $88, %esp
.Ltmp16:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 104
.Ltmp17:
.cfi_offset %esi, -16
.Ltmp18:
.cfi_offset %edi, -12
.Ltmp19:
.cfi_offset %ebx...
2016 Aug 05
2
A thought to improve IPRA
...## @opts_IdIsNull
> .cfi_startproc
> ## BB#0: ## %entry
> pushq %rbp
> Ltmp9:
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> Ltmp10:
> .cfi_offset %rbp, -16
> movq %rsp, %rbp
> Ltmp11:
> .cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
> pushq %rsi
> pushq %rcx
> Ltmp12:
> .cfi_offset %rcx, -32
> Ltmp13:
> .cfi_offset %rsi, -24
> movl %edi, %eax
> movl $-1, %edi
> popq %rcx
> popq %rsi
> popq %rbp
> jmp _opts_IdEqual ## TAILCALL
> .cfi_endproc
>
> Here before tailcall due to odl values are returned back resul...
2016 Aug 16
2
A thought to improve IPRA
...t;> ## BB#0: ## %entry
>> pushq %rbp
>> Ltmp9:
>> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
>> Ltmp10:
>> .cfi_offset %rbp, -16
>> movq %rsp, %rbp
>> Ltmp11:
>> .cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
>> pushq %rsi
>> pushq %rcx
>> Ltmp12:
>> .cfi_offset %rcx, -32
>> Ltmp13:
>> .cfi_offset %rsi, -24
>> movl %edi, %eax
>> movl $-1, %edi
>> popq %rcx
>> popq %rsi
>> popq %rbp
>> jmp _opts_IdEqual ## TAILCALL
>> .cfi_endproc
>>
>> Here before tailcall due...
2011 Oct 19
0
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
...en4
movl %ebp, %edi
movl $1, %esi
movl %ebx, %edx
callq error
.LBB0_9: # %then5
movl %ebp, %edi
movl $1, %esi
movl %ebx, %edx
callq error
.Ltmp11:
.size test, .Ltmp11-test
.Ltmp12:
.cfi_endproc
.Leh_func_end0:
.section ".note.GNU-stack","", at progbits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111019/ca556d5c/attachment.html>
------...
2012 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] Runtime linker issue wtih X11R6 on i386 with -O3 optimization
...a.c:13:2
.Ltmp9:
movl -8(%ebp), %ecx
movl %edx, (%esp)
movl %ecx, 4(%esp)
movl %eax, %ebx
calll printf at PLT
.loc 1 14 1 # a.c:14:1
movl %eax, -12(%ebp) # 4-byte Spill
addl $20, %esp
popl %ebx
popl %ebp
ret
.Ltmp10:
.Ltmp11:
.size moo, .Ltmp11-moo
.Lfunc_end0:
.Ltmp12:
.cfi_endproc
.Leh_func_end0:
.globl meh
.align 16, 0x90
.type meh, at function
meh: # @meh
.Ltmp16:
.cfi_startproc
.Lfunc_begin1:
.loc 1 18 0 # a.c:18:0
# BB#0:
pushl %ebp
.Ltmp17:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
.Ltmp18:
.cfi_offset %ebp, -8
mo...
2016 Jul 29
2
A thought to improve IPRA
----- Original Message -----
> From: "vivek pandya" <vivekvpandya at gmail.com>
> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Quentin Colombet"
> <qcolombet at apple.com>, "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 5:02:44 AM
>
2011 Oct 19
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> As for why it should be an IR pass, mostly because once the selection dag
>> runs through the code, we can never recover all of the freedom we have at
>> the IR level. To start with, splicing MBBs around requires known about
2016 Jul 29
0
A thought to improve IPRA
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "vivek pandya" <vivekvpandya at gmail.com>
> > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com>
> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>,
> "Quentin