search for: lsv

I'm sure this exists elsewhere, but, as a trade-off, could you achieve what you want with a separate helper function F(expr) that constructs the function you want to pass to [lsv]apply()? Something that would allow you to write: sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), F(summary(lm(mpg ~ wt,.))$r.squared)) Such an F() function would apply elsewhere too. /Henrik On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:30 AM Michael Mahoney <mike.mahoney.218 at gmail.com> wrote: > > This syntax i...

Hi, I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic modification of FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an example. With this new feature, the following call sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), func...

...bly an easier solution for this wish than adding a reserved variable and adding additional syntax to the apply family as a whole. Thanks, -Mike > From: Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> > Date: Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:03 PM > Subject: Re: [Rd] suggestion: "." in [lsv]apply() > To: William Dunlap <wdunlap at tibco.com> > Cc: r-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> > > > Thanks Bill, > > Clearly, my first proposition for wsapply() is quick and dirty one. > However, if "." becomes a reserved variable with this new syntax, &...

Serguei, > On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic modification of FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an example. With this new feature, the following call > > sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl...

...\", deparse(s))" Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 7:25 AM Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic modification of > FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). The idea is to > allow one-liner expressions without typing "function(item) {...}" to > surround them. The argument to the anonymous function is simply referred > as ".". Let take an example. With this new feature, the following call > > sapply(split(mtca...

...or others). > > Le 16/04/2020 ? 16:48, Simon Urbanek a ?crit : >> Serguei, >>> On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> wrote: Hi, I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic modification of FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an example. With this new feature, the following call sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), function...

...others). Le 16/04/2020 ? 16:48, Simon Urbanek a ?crit?: > Serguei, >> On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >> wrote: Hi, I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic >> modification of FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). >> The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without typing >> "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the >> anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an example. >> With this new feature, the following call sa...

...gt; Serguei, > >>>> On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> > >>>> wrote: Hi, I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic > >>>> modification of FUN argument in the family of functions > >>>> [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without > >>>> typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the > >>>> anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an example. > >>>> With this new feat...

We already have a pass that vectorizes loads and stores in nvptx and amdgpu. Not at my laptop, I forget the exact filename, but it's called load-store vectorizer. I think the question is, why is LSV not vectorizing this code? I think the answer is, llvm can't tell that the loads are aligned. Ptxas can, but only because it's (apparently) doing vectorization *after* it reesolves the shmem variables to physical addresses. That is a cool trick, and llvm can't do it, because llvm nev...

...?crit : >>> Serguei, >>>> On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>> wrote: Hi, I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic >>>> modification of FUN argument in the family of functions >>>> [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without >>>> typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the >>>> anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an example. >>>> With this new feature, the fol...

...t;>>>>> On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>>> wrote: Hi, I would like to make a suggestion for a small >>>>>> syntactic modification of FUN argument in the family of functions >>>>>> [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without >>>>>> typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to >>>>>> the anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an >>>>>> example. With t...

Hi all, I'm looking into the performance difference of a benchmark compiled with NVCC vs NVPTX (coming from Julia, not CUDA C) and I'm seeing a significant difference due to PTX instruction ordering. The relevant source code consists of two nested loops that get fully unrolled, doing some basic arithmetic with values loaded from shared memory: > #define BLOCK_SIZE 16 > >

I have this: mount -t smbfs -o username=rharris,rw,uid=rharris,gid=500,fmask=640,dmask=750 \ //fileserver.lsv.raindance.com/departments +/wmnt/fileserver/departments (all on one line though, the backslash in for readability) When I run that I get this: INFO: Debug class all level = 2 (pid 24219 from pid 24219) can't determine netmask for 127. added interface ip=10.10.117.230 bcast=10.10.117.255 nm...

Hi!! Of late, I'm getting a lot of un-solicited mails from this list, and inspite of un-subscribing mails, messages, threats , nothing really seems to work... My question: 1. Is there any way I can 'avoid' or 'bounce' incoming messages at the mail-server level?? 2. I cannot change my address (alias) as such... since this involves sending reminders to God knows how many

I am curious if there is any way to list only variables or functions in current environment, rather than listing all objects? Thanks. -- Daehyok Shin (Peter) Geography Department Univ. of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

I am curious if there is any way to list only variables or functions in current environment, rather than listing all objects? Thanks. -- Daehyok Shin (Peter) Geography Department Univ. of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

...LJ97H1V2 100K build/tools/clang/test/Index/Output/index-module-with-vfs.m.tmp.cache 100K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.res 100K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.scope 96K build/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/redecl-merge2.m.tmp/14O45ARCRLSI5 96K build/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/lsv-debuginfo.cpp.tmp 96K build/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/libc-libcxx.cpp.tmp 96K build/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/autolink.m.tmp/14O45ARCRLSI5 96K build/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/auto-module-import.m.tmp/14O45ARCRLSI5 96K build/tools/clang/test/Frontend/Output/rewrite-includes-mod...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking