search for: lst_manage

On 06/07/2016 05:05 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 7 Jun 2016 12:44, "Emmett Culley" <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: >> >> I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all > cases firewall-config is not functional. >> >> First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on > one, it don't change to "check...

I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all cases firewall-config is not functional. First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on one, it don't change to "checked", and nothing changes on the firewall. However you do see a "Changes applied" Sometimes, f you go to permanent mode and attempt to edit a zone, the whole

I am seeing these lines for each domain in the systemd journal: zone relationship123.com/IN: loading from master file relationship123.com.db failed: file not found zone relationship123.com/IN: not loaded due to errors. _default/relationship123.com./IN: file not found If I change the zone defs to include the full path: >From zone "relationships123.com." IN { type master; file

On Jan 5, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Emmett Culley <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: > > I am seeing these lines for each domain in the systemd journal: > > zone relationship123.com/IN: loading from master file relationship123.com.db failed: file not found > zone relationship123.com/IN: not loaded due to errors. > _default/relations...

On 7 Jun 2016 12:44, "Emmett Culley" <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: > > I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all cases firewall-config is not functional. > > First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on one, it don't change to "checked", and nothing chan...

On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: > > I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network connections are static. There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one big one is that the 'network' service runs once, on boot. If there is no network...

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley <lst_manage at webengineer.com> > wrote: >> >> I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network >> connections are static. > > There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one > big one is that the 'network' service runs onc...

On 06/07/2016 04:46 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: >> I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network connections are static. > There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one big one is that the 'network' service runs once, on boot. If there is no netwo...

On 10/12/2015 10:03 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/12/2015 06:23 PM, Emmett Culley wrote: >> I expect to see the second output upon reboot. > > Thanks, that's a lot more clear. Weird, though. Does /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 specify a "ZONE="? Are you using the "network" or the "NetworkManager" service? >

On 4/22/19 10:45 AM, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 22.04.19 18:12, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> On 4/21/19 10:15 AM, Ulf Volmer wrote: > >>> package-cleanup --dupes >>> >>> will list the duplicate packages >>> >>> package-cleanup --cleandupes >>> >>> will remove the dupes. If I remember correctly, you have to add

On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make

On 7/21/20 9:59 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>>> that

Every time I update my system with clamav, it doesn't restart and freshclam no longer works, because of a permission issue on the log directory. Each time I update clamav I have to search the Internet to figure out what there is to do. That NEVER helps so I try different combinations on user and group in amavis-new and clamav configuratio files, until I eventually get them both to work. I

On 10/12/2015 10:17 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/11/2015 03:00 PM, Emmett Culley wrote: >> I just noticed that when rebooting a CentOS 7 server the firewall comes back up with both interfaces set to REJECT, instead of the eth1 interface set to ACCEPT as defined in 'permanent' firewalld configuration files. > > Rather than paraphrasing, could you show the specific

On 01/13/2015 12:10 PM, Mateusz Guz wrote: > Have you found a solution? > > Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:02 AM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject:

On 4/21/19 10:15 AM, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 21.04.19 16:14, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> When I attempted to update a remote server via SSH last night the UPS on >> my local workstations failed, causing the SSH session to get dropped in >> the middle of the upgrade process.? This morning I am not able to >> complete the update.? When it failed when I tried to run

I have mostly succeeded in getting master and slave DNS servers operational. Mostly, because the zone file is not written when a zone is updated on the master server when the notify and transfer process happens. The slave DNS server gets the changes to the modified zone, but the slave zone file remains as before. I've found a few tutorials and lots of discussions, many of which talk about

Yesterday I noticed that I was not able to ping one of our development servers so I logged in via VNC and ran the Firewalld GUI. To my surprise, except for the interface definition for public and trusted zones, nothing seemed to be configured. That is, none of the services were checked off that we want open at the firewall. Also, this server is a gateway and masquerading and forwarding appears

On 12/19/2017 03:37 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 15:05 -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: >> I have two VMs, both with firewalld installed. One on machine It >> this in the IN_public chain: >> >> Chain IN_public (2 references) >> pkts bytes target prot opt >> in out source destination >> 81 3423

On 7/13/20 4:21 PM, Phoenix, Merka wrote: >>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.>> >>> Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for