Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "lsp_scale".
Did you mean:
  s_scale
  
2006 Jun 01
1
Fixed-point version
Hello list
I'm joining the effort to port speex to a fixed-point version, but as  
I'm a physicist used to deal only with floating point numbers (lots  
of them), I have no practice in working with fixed-point versions of  
such numbers.
For instance, in the first source I'm trying to work with, nb_celp.c,  
it is hard to see that the following two lines of code yield the same  
2004 Aug 06
0
[ANNOUNCE] PocketPC Port for speex-1.1.5 with sample code
I emailed Jean-Marc the arch.h about one week ago, not quite sure whether he
actually received that email.
 
Anyway, here I have an improved version of arch.h that I believe that it
would be better, to use __int64 only if compiling on eMbedded Visual C++
compiler, so for any other compiler, keep it the same (use long long)
 
 
----------------------------------
Chan Kei Yuen (Kenji)
 
 
2007 Aug 06
2
11kbps narrowband on a 24bit DSP
Hi,
 
I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a 24bit DSP that has a severe program and
data space limitations. I am only interested in the speex decoder for
11kbps narrowband implementation. 
 
I am using the following parameters and structures
 
160,    /*frameSize*/
  40,     /*subframeSize*/
  10,     /*lpcSize*/
  17,     /*pitchStart*/
  144,    /*pitchEnd*/ 
 
/* 11 kbps medium bit-rate
2004 Aug 06
2
[ANNOUNCE] PocketPC Port for speex-1.1.5 with sample code
Hi Jean-Marc,
Based on the wonderful Speex project, I've created SpeexOutLoud, essentially a Speex codec port for Windows Mobile 2003 devices. 
I've included a sample project intended to show the usage of SpeexOutLoud codec in a Pocket PC application based on .NET Compact Framework.
I'd request you to please go through the attached build, and include it as a contribution to the
2007 Aug 06
0
11kbps narrowband on a 24bit DSP
I've never tried Speex on a 24-bit DSP, but I would suggest actually
leaving the code (nearly) as-is. The scaling factors actually should not
change because I'm using integer multiplications, not fractional
multiplications. So what should happen is that the top 8 bits or 24-bit
values and the top 16-bit of 48-bit values will be unused (filled with
sign bits). There may be a few cases where
2005 May 25
3
Speex on TI C6x, Problem with TI C5x Patch
Hi Jean-Marc, Hi Jim,
I have also seen some problems with the 1.1.8 release on the C55x. So far I 
have boiled down the issues to the following:
1) We need our own "fixed_xx.h" header file. I don't know why, and haven't 
had time to investigate, but there is a definite improvement when I use the 
attached fixed_c55x.h file which has turned all the maths into inline 
functions.