search for: lsb_version

...posix.cc:53: In file included from /usr/include/sys/vt.h:1: /usr/include/linux/vt.h:74:15: error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers unsigned int new; /* New console (if changing) */ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ My machine: $ cat /etc/*release* LSB_VERSION="core-2.0-noarch:core-3.2-noarch:core-4.0-noarch:core-2.0-x86_64:core-3.2-x86_64:core-4.0-x86_64" cat: /etc/lsb-release.d: Is a directory SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64) VERSION = 11 PATCHLEVEL = 3 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64) VERSION = 11 PATCHLEVEL = 3 $ uname -a Li...

Hi I am using the system as shown below. ********************************* [root at localhost sbin]# cat /etc/*release LSB_VERSION=base-4.0-amd64:base-4.0-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphi cs-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noarch Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago) Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago) [root at localhost sbin]# uname -a Linux localh...

...ISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint > + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=10 > + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=julia > + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 10 Julia" > + * Linux Mint also has /etc/linuxmint/info with more information, > + * but we can use the LSB file. > + * > + * Mandriva has: > + * LSB_VERSION=lsb-4.0-amd64:lsb-4.0-noarch > + * DISTRIB_ID=MandrivaLinux > + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=2010.1 > + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=Henry_Farman > + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Mandriva Linux 2010.1" > + * Mandriva also has a normal release file called /etc/mandriva-release. > + * > +...

Hi All We are currently testing our product using KVM as the hypervisor. We are not using KVM as a bare-metal hypervisor. We use it on top of a RHEL installation. So basically RHEL acts as our host and using KVM we deploy guests on this system. We have all along tested and shipped our application image for VMware ESXi installations , So this it the first time we are trying our application

...nux Mint was found to have this: + * DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=10 + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=julia + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 10 Julia" + * Linux Mint also has /etc/linuxmint/info with more information, + * but we can use the LSB file. + * + * Mandriva has: + * LSB_VERSION=lsb-4.0-amd64:lsb-4.0-noarch + * DISTRIB_ID=MandrivaLinux + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=2010.1 + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=Henry_Farman + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Mandriva Linux 2010.1" + * Mandriva also has a normal release file called /etc/mandriva-release. + * + * CoreOS has a /etc/lsb-release li...

...nux Mint was found to have this: + * DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=10 + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=julia + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 10 Julia" + * Linux Mint also has /etc/linuxmint/info with more information, + * but we can use the LSB file. + * + * Mandriva has: + * LSB_VERSION=lsb-4.0-amd64:lsb-4.0-noarch + * DISTRIB_ID=MandrivaLinux + * DISTRIB_RELEASE=2010.1 + * DISTRIB_CODENAME=Henry_Farman + * DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Mandriva Linux 2010.1" + * Mandriva also has a normal release file called /etc/mandriva-release. + * + * CoreOS has a /etc/lsb-release li...

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This is the (incomplete) patch which reimplements inspection APIs in the daemon. All ‘XXX’s in this patch indicate areas which are not yet implemented or need further work. Rich.

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.