Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "lrwi".
Did you mean:
lrw
2010 Oct 01
0
ACL handling bugs in v1.2.8+ and v2.0
...verride may not have worked as expected).
The bug happened when two or more ACL entries of same "type" existed.
The first entry was handled correctly, but the next ones may have only
been adding ACLs rather than replacing them. For example if you had the
following ACL file:
group=people lrwi
user=foo lr
user=bar lr
So basically everyone in "people" group should have "lrwi" rights, but
foo and bar users should have only "lr" rights. If foo and bar didn't
belong to people group, everything would work as expected. If they did,
then what would happen is:...
2010 Oct 01
0
ACL handling bugs in v1.2.8+ and v2.0
...verride may not have worked as expected).
The bug happened when two or more ACL entries of same "type" existed.
The first entry was handled correctly, but the next ones may have only
been adding ACLs rather than replacing them. For example if you had the
following ACL file:
group=people lrwi
user=foo lr
user=bar lr
So basically everyone in "people" group should have "lrwi" rights, but
foo and bar users should have only "lr" rights. If foo and bar didn't
belong to people group, everything would work as expected. If they did,
then what would happen is:...