search for: lruntest

...000000010000493d in llvm::RuntimeDyldMachO::loadObject () #4 0x0000000100003cf9 in llvm::RuntimeDyld::loadObject () #5 0x00000001000032e5 in llvm::MCJIT::MCJIT () #6 0x00000001000021c2 in llvm::MCJIT::createJIT () #7 0x0000000100023274 in llvm::EngineBuilder::create () #8 0x0000000100001417 in lRunTest (fn=0x7fff5fbffb3a "a.bc") at bug.cpp:44 #9 0x000000010000175a in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fff5fbff9c8) at bug.cpp:61 (gdb) quit On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > Ah, now that makes sense. Guess I was a little over-eager with my > bugreport. Thanks! :) > &gt...

...:RuntimeDyldMachO::loadObject () > #4 0x0000000100003cf9 in llvm::RuntimeDyld::loadObject () > #5 0x00000001000032e5 in llvm::MCJIT::MCJIT () > #6 0x00000001000021c2 in llvm::MCJIT::createJIT () > #7 0x0000000100023274 in llvm::EngineBuilder::create () > #8 0x0000000100001417 in lRunTest (fn=0x7fff5fbffb3a "a.bc") at bug.cpp:44 > #9 0x000000010000175a in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fff5fbff9c8) at bug.cpp:61 > (gdb) quit > > > On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > >> Ah, now that makes sense. Guess I was a little over-eager with my &g...

Ah, now that makes sense. Guess I was a little over-eager with my bugreport. Thanks! :) However, I am now running into the same Problem as Matt ("Target does not support MC emission!"). Best, Ralf Am 25.08.2011 19:32, schrieb Bruno Cardoso Lopes: > Hi Ralf, > > FYI, old JIT doesn't support AVX at all, no encoding info, etc... The > only way to use AVX+JIT is using

Hi Ralf, FYI, old JIT doesn't support AVX at all, no encoding info, etc... The only way to use AVX+JIT is using MCJIT, which contains the correct encoding, but unfortunately the framework isn't good yet as the old one is. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Ralf Karrenberg <Chareos at gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I am unsure about MCJIT, but I guess the problem is the same.