Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "lpad40".
Did you mean:
lpad10
2014 Nov 06
2
[LLVMdev] Should the MachineVerifier accept a MBB with a single (landing pad) successor?
...ks are:
BB#7: derived from LLVM BB %invoke.cont41
EH_LABEL <MCSym=Ltmp4>
B <BB#8>
Successors according to CFG: BB#8(1) BB#9(1)
BB#8: derived from LLVM BB %invoke.cont43
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#7
BB#9: derived from LLVM BB %lpad40, EH LANDING PAD
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#7
EH_LABEL <MCSym=Ltmp5>
...
The unreachable BB#8 gets removed, and we end up with:
BB#5: derived from LLVM BB %invoke.cont41
...
B <BB#8>
Successors according to CFG...