search for: lp_read_only

...quot;use chroot", P_BOOL, P_LOCAL, &sDefault.use_chroot, NULL, 0}, {"ignore nonreadable",P_BOOL, P_LOCAL, &sDefault.ignore_nonreadable, NULL, 0}, @@ -342,6 +345,7 @@ FN_LOCAL_STRING(lp_path, path) FN_LOCAL_STRING(lp_lock_file, lock_file) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_read_only, read_only) +FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_write_only, write_only) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_list, list) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_use_chroot, use_chroot) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_transfer_logging, transfer_logging) diff -urN rsync-2.5.2.orig/main.c rsync-2.5.2/main.c --- rsync-2.5.2.orig/main.c Fri Jan 25 11:07:41 2002 +++ rsync-2.5...

...P_LOCAL, &sDefault.use_chroot, NULL, 0}, {"ignore nonreadable",P_BOOL, P_LOCAL, &sDefault.ignore_nonreadable, NULL, 0}, @@ -353,6 +356,7 @@ FN_LOCAL_STRING(lp_comment, comment) FN_LOCAL_STRING(lp_path, path) FN_LOCAL_STRING(lp_lock_file, lock_file) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_read_only, read_only) +FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_write_only, write_only) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_list, list) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_use_chroot, use_chroot) FN_LOCAL_BOOL(lp_transfer_logging, transfer_logging) --- rsync-2.6.0/proto.h.orig Thu Feb 12 11:48:01 2004 +++ rsync-2.6.0/proto.h Thu Feb 12 11:48:23 2004 @@ -125,6 +12...

Hey all, Like a lot of folks, I use rsync to pull content out to production web servers. Tastes great, less filling. Here's what I'd like to be able to do: Sometimes a web tree is not ready to sync, for whatever reason. I have many modules available, so stopping ryncd is not an option. I'd like to be able to tell rsync in daemon mode "this particular module is not available at

...]; if (verbose > 2) { rprintf(FINFO, "server_sender starting pid=%ld\n", (long)getpid()); } if (am_daemon && lp_write_only(module_id)) { rprintf(FERROR, "ERROR: module is write only\n"); exit_cleanup(RERR_SYNTAX); return; } if (am_daemon && lp_read_only(module_id) && remove_sent_files) { rprintf(FERROR, "ERROR: --remove-sent-files cannot be used with a read-only module\n"); exit_cleanup(RERR_SYNTAX); return; } if (!relative_paths && !push_dir(dir)) { rsyserr(FERROR, errno, "push_dir#3 %s failed&quot...

> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch? Thanks for the reminder. I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the "branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or Wednesday. I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the man page, so we should fix that in the future.