Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "lowervselect".
Did you mean:
lowerselect
2013 Aug 20
1
[LLVMdev] [X86] DAG Combine - VSELECT
Can this optimization be moved to the lowering phase? LowerVSELECT() ?
- Elena
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Eli Friedman
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 03:56
To: Juergen Ributzka
Cc: Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [X86] DAG Combine - VSELECT
On Mon, Aug...
2013 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] [X86] DAG Combine - VSELECT
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Juergen Ributzka <juergen at apple.com> wrote:
> I see. We still can use that shortcut to catch the simple case after type
> legalization, but we could also do a more elaborate type check before type
> legalization to enable it?
>
If you're going to write the code to check the types anyway, it's probably
clearer to remove the
2013 Aug 19
3
[LLVMdev] [X86] DAG Combine - VSELECT
I see. We still can use that shortcut to catch the simple case after type legalization, but we could also do a more elaborate type check before type legalization to enable it?
On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Juergen Ributzka <juergen at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi @ll,
>
> I am wondering about the