search for: lowervastart

...gmail.com>wrote: > I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment, > but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that > there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in > LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS and what happens in LowerVASTART in > ARMISelLowering.cpp. > > deep > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:45 AM, robert muth<robert at muth.org> wrote: > > I wrote a few scripts to run llvm/arm against the gnu c torture test > suite > > which consists of over 900 smallish tests. > > > > The...

I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment, but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS and what happens in LowerVASTART in ARMISelLowering.cpp. deep On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:45 AM, robert muth<robert at muth.org> wrote: > I wrote a few scripts to run llvm/arm against the gnu c torture test suite > which consists of  over 900 smallish tests. > > There were quite a few failures with llvm/arm which...

I wrote a few scripts to run llvm/arm against the gnu c torture test suite which consists of over 900 smallish tests. There were quite a few failures with llvm/arm which I hereby want to report (see attached tarball for the actual failing testsc). Most of the failures are related to vararg/stdarg. I think I saw a bug files for this but cannot find it anymore. Is somebody on this? Finally, I

...om > > wrote: > I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment, > but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that > there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in > LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS and what happens in LowerVASTART in > ARMISelLowering.cpp. > > deep > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:45 AM, robert muth<robert at muth.org> wrote: > > I wrote a few scripts to run llvm/arm against the gnu c torture > test suite > > which consists of over 900 smallish tests. > > > > T...

...> >> I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment, >> but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that >> there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in >> LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS and what happens in LowerVASTART in >> ARMISelLowering.cpp. >> >> deep >> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:45 AM, robert muth<robert at muth.org> wrote: >> > I wrote a few scripts to run llvm/arm against the gnu c torture test >> suite >> > which consists of over 900 smallis...

...ng a return statement which Visual Studio 2005 Beta flags as an error rather than as a warning. I have put in dummy constructors in return statements to allow CodeGen and Target libraries to build. The files :- \llvm\lib\codegen\selectiondag\selectiondagisel.cpp llvm::TargetLowering::LowerVAStart llvm::TargetLowering::LowerVAArgNext llvm::TargetLowering::LowerOperation \llvm\lib\target\targetframeinfo.cpp llvm::TargetFrameInfo::adjustAlignment llvm::TargetFrameInfo::getIncomingArgOffset llvm::TargetFrameInfo::getOutgoingArgOffset llv...

...dependancy on a particular directory layout ? Errors ===== \llvm\lib\codegen\selectiondag\selectiondagisel.cpp -------------------------------------------------------------------------- c:\languages\llvm\lib\codegen\selectiondag\selectiondagisel.cpp(723) : error C4716: 'llvm::TargetLowering::LowerVAStart' : must return a value c:\languages\llvm\lib\codegen\selectiondag\selectiondagisel.cpp(744) : error C4716: 'llvm::TargetLowering::LowerVAArgNext' : must return a value c:\languages\llvm\lib\codegen\selectiondag\selectiondagisel.cpp(792) : error C4716: 'llvm::TargetLowering::LowerOpe...

...tOperand(1)); + + } + + SDValue SparcTargetLowering::LowerEH_SJLJ_LONGJMP(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, + const SparcTargetLowering &TLI) const { + SDLoc DL(Op); + return DAG.getNode(SPISD::EH_SJLJ_LONGJMP, DL, MVT::Other, Op.getOperand(0), Op.getOperand(1)); + } + static SDValue LowerVASTART(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, const SparcTargetLowering &TLI) { MachineFunction &MF = DAG.getMachineFunction(); *************** *** 3004,3009 **** --- 3023,3030 ---- hasHardQuad); case ISD::SELECT...