search for: lowermost

...;call void @llvm.memcpy.i32( i8* %a, i8* %b, i32 %c, i32 %d ) ;call void @llvm.memcpy.i32( i8* %a, i8* %b, i32 0, i32 0 ) ret void } I compile this with llvm-as memcpy-intrinsic.ll -f -o memcpy-intrinsic.bc && llc -f -o memcpy-intrinsic.s memcpy-intrinsic.bc Now, if I uncomment the lowermost memcpy, this produces no errors. If I uncomment the uppermost memcpy instead, I get during lcc: llc: /var/bcoppens/llvm/llvm-svn/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:199: typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X = llvm::ConstantInt, Y = llvm::Value*]:...

Hello, I have a nested named list structure, like the following: x <- list( list( list(df1,df2) list(df3, list(df4,df5)) list(df6,df7))) with df1...d7 as data frames. Every data frame is named. Is there a way to get a specific named element in x? so, for example, x[[c("df5")]] gives me the data frame 5? Thank you in advance! Best, Friedericksen

...32 %c, i32 %d ) > ;call void @llvm.memcpy.i32( i8* %a, i8* %b, i32 0, i32 0 ) > ret void > } > > I compile this with > > llvm-as memcpy-intrinsic.ll -f -o memcpy-intrinsic.bc && llc -f -o > memcpy-intrinsic.s memcpy-intrinsic.bc > > Now, if I uncomment the lowermost memcpy, this produces no errors. If I > uncomment the uppermost memcpy instead, I get during lcc: > > llc: /var/bcoppens/llvm/llvm-svn/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:199: > typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X = > llvm::Constant...

...supposed to clear the screen when the configuration file is parsed. As I reported several years ago, whichever method (of the above three) is used, it (currently?) fails under UEFI. @Barry, One potential alternative would be to use less rows in the menu, leaving space to display text at the lowermost area of the screen, but such text can only use one (electable) color (in contrast to the msg files, which can display each character in a different color). IMHO, this alternative does not worth the time for this particular project. Since you are using only 2 menu entries, would you consider the...

...e the switch to alaw which is offered by provider. 2. Asterisk would have done completely unnecessary transcoding even if g729 transcoding would have been supported. I would be glad, if Asterisk would take better care of what it's deciding which codec to use. g729 was the codec with the lowermost priority in the own offered SDP to the provider but it anyway accepts this codec even though provider offers the own most desired alaw! Thanks, Michael

> In languages without stack-allocated objects (ie. most languages that > support exceptions) there is no need to unwind frame-by-frame, the > unwind simply needs to make a single jump to the invoke instruction and > restore the context (which in x86 is just 6 registers). > No. Java, C#, Ruby and Python all support the finally/ensure block; C# supports the using( IDisposable x

On 8/4/17, Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > >> Note, I am using syslinux from Ubuntu 16.04.2, presume that is 6.03. >> >> Regards, >> Barry > > Before investing time in replying to each different (unexpected) > behavior, I would suggest testing with *pre-built* binaries from > 6.04-pre1 downloaded from kernel.org (considering the