Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "lowercoveragedata".
2015 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] why is coverage map and profile names mixed?
Hi
I'm referencing the method:
Lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/InstrProfiling.cpp:InstrProfiling::lowerCoverageData()
At the end of the function, why is the variable being placed in __llvm_prf_names section?
Shouldn't it be placed in __llvm_covmap section?
Thanks
Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150...
2017 Jun 27
4
My experience using -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED_COVERAGE to generate coverage
With llc, the size of the names section can vary widely depending on the value of -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD.
Enabling coverage shouldn't increase the name section size much. I only see one place where this happens, and it's relatively cold:
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/llvm/coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at