search for: lowercaselett

If _<lowerCaseLetter> violates a standard, please say which one. It does not violate the C++11 standard: •Reserved in any scope, including for use as implementation macros: •identifiers beginning with an underscore followed immediately by an uppercase letter •identifiers containing adjacent underscores (or &quot...

On 2/4/2019 2:29 PM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 20:21, JD Jones <jjones at prc-hsv.com> wrote: >> If _<lowerCaseLetter> violates a standard, please say which one. It does not violate the C++11 standard: > > If strictly adhered to, it doesn't, and I've never claimed any > different. But coding standards are never strictly adhered to. > Particularly not in a codebase like LLVM which already...

...ruary 4, 2019 2:51 PM > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Variable names rule > Importance: Low > > On 2/4/2019 2:29 PM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 20:21, JD Jones <jjones at prc-hsv.com> wrote: > >> If _<lowerCaseLetter> violates a standard, please say which one. It > does not violate the C++11 standard: > > > > If strictly adhered to, it doesn't, and I've never claimed any > > different. But coding standards are never strictly adhered to. > > Particularly not in a codebase...

...<Michael.Platings at arm.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; nd <nd at arm.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Variable names rule On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 17:20, JD Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > · Non-static data members: _<lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase> (This was allowed by the C++ standard I last read. It’s _<UpperCase> that is reserved) This is about the one thing I'd be truly unhappy to see us adopt (for any situation). I think the interaction with acronyms is just too pathological. You get a really weird identifie...