search for: loweel

You’re talking about Layer 2 bridging by Tinc? The use case here is layer 3 routing, but anyway, thanks for your feedback. > On 1 May 2017, at 8:09 PM, LowEel <loweel at gmx.de> wrote: > > I cannot understand why you say the configuration for B will be tricky. > > If you select the switch mode, and some machine can initiate a > connection to some other machine, until > > there is a path, the whole net will behave as all the...

Hi, Tinc experts Diagram as below, A is trying to access host X behind C: A >> B >> C — “host X" B is the tinc server for A, but also B is the tinc client to connect to C. My question is, if I only use one VPN (/etc/tinc/myvpn), then the host configuration for B will be tricky. As the tinc server to A, B’s host config (/etc/tinc/myvpn/hosts/B) needs have the Subnet = X/32,

I cannot understand why you say the configuration for B will be tricky. If you select the switch mode, and some machine can initiate a connection to some other machine, until there is a path, the whole net will behave as all the tap device were connected to a single switch. Is not a vpn in the strict ipsec meaning, you should see it more like an encrypted VLAN. On 05/01/2017 12:00 PM, Bright