search for: low_proc

...d you add to the the Atom class(es)? I thought you were thinking of a generic uint32_t DefinedAtom::flags() method where the meaning of each bit in the uint32_t returned was platform specific. How can that work with a min/max range? >> > The range of flags would be integers ranging from LOW_PROC .. HIGH_PROC. > > The Generic flags would be within the range less than LOW_PROC and greater HIGH_PROC. Any value within the range LOW_PROC .. HIGH_PROC is os/platform specific. > > What I was thinking was there could be a uint32_t flags() in the definedAtom which returns the flags,...

...od(s) would you add to the the Atom class(es)? I thought you were thinking of a generic uint32_t DefinedAtom::flags() method where the meaning of each bit in the uint32_t returned was platform specific. How can that work with a min/max range? > The range of flags would be integers ranging from LOW_PROC .. HIGH_PROC. The Generic flags would be within the range less than LOW_PROC and greater HIGH_PROC. Any value within the range LOW_PROC .. HIGH_PROC is os/platform specific. What I was thinking was there could be a uint32_t flags() in the definedAtom which returns the flags, and platforms can...

Hi Nick, >> The range of flags would be integers ranging from LOW_PROC .. HIGH_PROC. >> >> The Generic flags would be within the range less than LOW_PROC and greater HIGH_PROC. Any value within the range LOW_PROC .. HIGH_PROC is os/platform specific. >> >> What I was thinking was there could be a uint32_t flags() in the definedAtom which retur...

On Oct 30, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Thanks for your reply. > > How about if the atom flags could be overridden ? The Atom flag could have a MIN/MAX and anything above the MAX or lower than the MIN are platform specific, like how its dealt with section indexes ? Can you be more specific in your proposal. What method(s) would you add to the the Atom