search for: louwtji

Hi there I''m busy with some tests on the above hardware and will post some scores soon. For those that do _not_ have the above available for tests, I''m open to suggestions on potential configs that I could run for you. Pop me a mail if you want something specific _or_ you have suggestions concerning filebench (varmail) config setup. Cheers This message posted from

...: bin/libsmbclient.a /usr/local/samba/lib ./install-sh -c /tmp/samba-3.0.0/source/include/libsmbclient.h /usr/local/samba/include mksh: Fatal error: Cannot load command `./install-sh': Bad file number Current working directory /tmp/samba-3.0.0/source *** Error code 1 (ignored) Error or not ? Louwtjie Burger Systems Engineer / System Administrator cell: +(27) 083 457 2551 email: burgerw@zaber.org.za Powered by Tiscali - http://www.tiscali.co.za

Hi All, We are currently in the process of testing Solaris 10 with ZFS and Oracle and are running it on a T2000. When checking performance statistics on the T2000, we notice that only one thread of the CPU appears to be doing any of the processing. Leaving all other threads seemingly idle. Are there any tuning parameters that need to be set or changed when running Oracle on T2000 using

Hi there Is it fair to compare the 2 solutions using Solaris 10 U2 and a commercial database (SAP SD scenario). The cache on the HW raid helps, and the CPU load is less... but the solution costs more and you _might_ not need the performance of the HW RAID. Has anybody with access to these units done a benchmark comparing the performance (and with the pricelist in hand) came to a conclusion.