search for: lot_

...other hand, a 3-way setup (or 2+arbiter) if free from all these > problems? > Free from a lot of problems, but apparently not as good as a replica 3 volume. I can't comment on arbiter, I only have replica 3 clusters. I can tell you that my colleagues setting up 2 nodes clusters have _a lot_ of problems. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170825/044b99af/attachment.sig>

Hello: [Kindly Cc when replying] The question in a nutshell is this: Is there a more robust alternative to Ecdf ()? The details: I've used Ecdf () _a lot_ over the past few years and I have learned to live with its warnings. But I am running short on time and patience now [*] Here is a reproducible example: > library (Hmisc) > x <- read.csv ( file = 'http://www.stat.osu.edu/~pkapat/miscl/Data4Ecdf.csv') > table (x[, c('X1'...

...set. Again, I really think that this patchset > > should be applied unless a technical reason, e.g. some deficiency > > introduced by one of the patches, says otherwise. HPA, what do you think? > > > > Step 1 is to commit it on a branch. > > -hpa > Without _a lot_ of testing, applying the patch "as-is" is not the best first step, IMHO. A separated branch sounds at least more reasonable in comparison. Additionally, the patch set seems to affect more-than-just-an-isolated file / feature, which means that incorporating other patches (still pendin...

...[11155]: refused unmount request from 192.168.42.2 for /root (/): no export ent ry I didn't understand why the hell it was trying to umount /root. You can look at google for this and you'll find a lot of people wondering what this is. I think that the big issue with this is that _a lot_ of problems appearing _after_ not unmounting correctly the share the first time are caused by this: I used to get mounting errors with ?Stale NFS file handle? that would never go away (NFS is so much a PITA for this statefull behavior). You'll find a lot of people on the net trying to reboot th...

...subset, let's say 97% of rows input <- input[sample(2^ncolumns, round(2^ncolumns*0.97, 0), ] minimized <- 1 while (sum(minimized) > 0) { minimized <- logical(nrow(input)) to.be.compared <- combn2(1:nrow(input)) # from package combinat # the following line takes _a lot_ of time, for millions of comparisons logical.result <- apply(to.be.compared, 1, function(idx) input[idx[1], ] == input[idx[2], ]) compare.minimized <- which(colSums(!logical.result) == 1) logical.result <- logical.result[, compare.minimized] result <- sapply(compare.mini...

...>> > should be applied unless a technical reason, e.g. some deficiency >> > introduced by one of the patches, says otherwise. HPA, what do you >> think? >> > >> >> Step 1 is to commit it on a branch. >> >> -hpa >> > > Without _a lot_ of testing, applying the patch "as-is" is not the best > first step, IMHO. A separated branch sounds at least more reasonable in > comparison. > > Additionally, the patch set seems to affect more-than-just-an-isolated > file / feature, which means that incorporating other p...

http://winehq.org/announce/1.1.19 wined3d: Remove some code that doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Why? Wine is used for old programs too. Now they won't work. Are you happy?

OK, today I got a few questions about regression testing. 1.Is there a way to get exact patch using git and regression testing? I mean, if I found that, as in tutorial: a460a2df43aa8eae10b1db028c6020829b009c54 is first bad commit commit a460a2df43aa8eae10b1db028c6020829b009c54 Author: Stefan Doesinger <stefandoesinger at gmx.at> Date: Sat Jun 9 14:27:41 2007 +0200 wined3d: Store the gl

...wine gecko from/usr/share/wine/gecko rather than redownload it each time. - Austin On Jan 4, 2008 4:50 PM, J=E9r=F4me Gardou <jgardou at yahoo.fr> wrote: > Le Friday 04 January 2008 23:10:41 Austin English, vous avez =E9crit: > > > That's not what I need. I rm -rf ~/.wine _a lot_, and was looking to > > find a way to have wine gecko on my computer, so everytime I test an > > app that needs gecko, it can simply used the cached version, and not > > download if from sourceforge every time. I remember seeing something a > > while back on how to do this,...

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, Please consider removing xen. New xen-3.0 splited packages are upcoming, making this one obsolete. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // <julien@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // The more we fly, the more we climb, the more we know that heaven is a lie. -------------- next part

On 25/08/2017 6:50 PM, lemonnierk at ulrar.net wrote: > Free from a lot of problems, but apparently not as good as a replica 3 > volume. I can't comment on arbiter, I only have replica 3 clusters. I > can tell you that my colleagues setting up 2 nodes clusters have_a lot_ > of problems. I run Replica 3 VM hosting (gfapi) via a 3 node proxmox cluster. Have done a lot of rolling node updates, power failures etc, never had a problem. Performance is better than any other DFS I've tried (Ceph, lizard/moose). Never did get DRDB working. nb: ZFS Bricks, with e...

...[11155]: refused unmount request from 192.168.42.2 for /root (/): no export ent ry I didn't understand why the hell it was trying to umount /root. You can look at google for this and you'll find a lot of people wondering what this is. I think that the big issue with this is that _a lot_ of problems appearing _after_ not unmounting correctly the share the first time are caused by this: I used to get mounting errors with ?Stale NFS file handle? that would never go away (NFS is so much a PITA for this statefull behavior). You'll find a lot of people on the net trying to reboot th...

Hi, I'm trying to build a redundant duo of firewalls/routers/gateways and I'm thinking about not putting any disks in them and instead using a usb-stick raid-1 as storage. Has anyone any experience with this? Since the machines will be running pretty much only iptables, conntrackd and keepalived there is not going to be a lot of disk activity going on and the plan is to do all the

I've just installed r-base (several times!) using the instructions at http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/ and for some reason it is not creating a /etc/R/ldpaths file. I've tried a few times, tried purging, and removing everything in /etc/R and /usr/lib/R as suggested by Dirk, and reinstalling but still get $ R /usr/bin/R: line 236: /usr/lib/R/etc/ldpaths: No such file

Support for SLES9 seems to be pretty much lacking at the moment. The OCFS2 site [1] states OCFS2 is supported with SP2+. There actually does not exist a SP2+ for SLES9 (or should this rather read "will be supported in SP3" instead?). Latest RPMs that come with SLES9 SP2 are 0.99.14 which has critical known bugs and is unusable. Anybody got to compile current source on SLES9 x86_64?

...ackages (ie those shipped with R sources) go 4) You have no conflict, but if you have a library 'foo' in several directories, the first one found wins. 5) On Debian, and thanks to cran2deb, I personally keep almost everything in /usr/lib/R/site-library as I use cran2deb _a lot_. /usr/local is only for unpackage code, or things I install directly from SVN, or ... 6) On Ubuntu, I tend to rely on install.packages() and R CMD INSTALL and the packages go into /usr/local/lib/R/site-library. I do not use cran2deb on Ubuntu. Other folks may have other recommendat...

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > The MultiFS syntax is basically "(hdX,Y)/path/to/file", where X is disk > > number and Y is partition number. > > > > Thank you. > > As a reminder, please note: > > _ There was a syntax discussion about "multifs", so additional syntax > forms

Il 25-08-2017 08:32 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > Hi all, > any other advice from who use (or do not use) Gluster as a replicated > VM backend? > > Thanks. Sorry, I was not seeing messages because I was not subscribed on the list; I read it from the web. So it seems that Pavel and WK have vastly different experience with Gluster. Any plausible cause for that difference? > WK

...o Xen so that we can use the TLS libraries that come with > e.g., Redhat 9 and Debian. Basically we take teh general protection > fault, then decode the instruction and interpret it if it''s trying to > access a -ve segment offset. > > Unfortunately the emulation triggers _a lot_! So it will affect > performance... > > However, I intend to add dynamic patching of the unexecutable > instructions to Linux -- it will detect instructions of a particular > limited class, and dynamically create fixup code, and patch the > original execution site to call the fix...

Il 23-08-2017 18:51 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > Il 23-08-2017 18:14 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto: >> Hi, after many VM crashes during upgrades of Gluster, losing network >> connectivity on one node etc. I would advise running replica 2 with >> arbiter. > > Hi Pavel, this is bad news :( > So, in your case at least, Gluster was not stable? Something as simple > as an