search for: losely

After fresh installation of CentOS 6.2 on my server, I get following errors in my dmesg output: ------- MTRR default type: uncachable MTRR fixed ranges enabled: 00000-9FFFF write-back A0000-BFFFF uncachable C0000-D7FFF write-protect D8000-E7FFF uncachable E8000-FFFFF write-protect MTRR variable ranges enabled: 0 base 000000000 mask C00000000 write-back 1 base 400000000 mask

Good Day All, Today I looked at the dmesg log and I notice that the following messages regarding mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size. I am currently running CentOS 6.3 and I installed CentOS 6.2 and 6.1 and I was seeing the same errors. When I installed CentOS 5.8 on the same laptop I do not see these errors. $ lsb_release -a LSB Version:

Hi, I have server that has been running 5.x - 5.8 for a few years without issue and decided to move it to a fresh install of 6.2. First thing I noticed is a good part of the log has these mtrr messages finally ending with "mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value" and "please specify mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size". I have been searching around and reading the kernel docs

Hey there, If you're like me, you've tried EVERYTHING to lose weight.  I know how you feel - the special diets, miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped me lose the pounds I need lose either.  It seemed like the harder I worked at it, the less weight I lost - until I heard about 'Extreme Power Plus'. You're probably thinking to yourself, "Oh geez, not

CentOS 6.4, current, Dell PE R720. Had an issue today with a bus error, and googling only found two year old references to problems with non-Dell drives (we just added two WD Reds, and mdadm raided them). So, looking through dmesg and /var/log/messages, I ran into a *lot* of G gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 256K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 0G gran_size: 128K chunk_size:

Long time no chat! How have you been? If you've been like me, you've been trying trying almost EVERYTHING to lose weight.  I know how you feel - the special diets, miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped me lose the pounds I needed to lose either.  It seemed like the harder I worked at it, the less weight I lost - until I heard about 'Extreme Power Plus'.

Ralf Hildebrandt reported[0] the following messages on ext3-users: name_count maxed, losing inode data: dev=00:05, inode=5221 because the filesystem in question is indeed ext3. However, this warning is not generated by ext3 code but by the audit framework. While the origins of these messages are discussed elsewhere[1] the following patch modifies the printks in question so that users know

Hi Everyone, I'm using Asterisk, actually A@H 1.1 with all Grandstream 102 phones. NAT is not an issue as all including the server have public IP's The problem is that the phones keep losing registration with the server. I have not timed this exactly to see if they drop off with exactly the same frequency. The SIP TRUNK connection to my provider SIPGATE does not lose registration, and

Reserved ip in 192.168.x.x range for CenOS 5 (Samba Server) loses samba clients due to eth0 losing it's ip. eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:61:72:AB:98 inet addr:169.254.66.122 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: fe80::204:61ff:fe72:ab98/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1492 Metric:1 RX packets:60058

I got numerous warnings when building rsync on IA64 (Itanium-2) using Intel C/C++ compiler (see attached). Is this expected? Thanks, Michael -------------- next part -------------- Script started on Fri 21 Sep 2007 06:14:05 PM BST ~/src$ ls -alt total 222884 -rw-r--r-- 1 mccssmb2 mcc101 0 Sep 21 18:14 build_rsync drwxr-xr-x 8 mccssmb2 mcc101 4096 Sep 21 18:14 . -rw-r--r-- 1

Hi, Recently I've noticed on a customer's GXP-2000 phone that it loses its IP addresse for a few seconds, audio goes blank obviously, and after about 30-60 seconds get the same IP addresse back and resumes the call. This shows that call was not dropped but phone lost connection with the server, whereas the caller on the other end was still talking. This is just unacceptable as this is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We've recently moved from 2.2.2a on Suse using PDC authentication with local accounts created, to 2.2.8a on Debian with Winbind authentication. We are mapping shares on user's machines via a login script. So here's the problem several users are losing access to their home directory mappings. In other words, we are mapping their home

I have 20-30 GXP2000's connected to * over a T1 line. Neither end is NAT'd and there is plenty of bandwidth available over the line. The GXP's are 1.1.5.15, which is the latest. I have a problem where the phones keep dropping off of * and I get a "failed to register" message in the log of *. Sometimes they eventually connect and sometimes, I have to reboot them to

Losing time offset from GMT: > sTime = as.POSIXct(paste("2008-03-03","09:30:01"), origin="1970-01-01") > sTime [1] "2008-03-03 09:30:01 EST" <---- 9.31am EST > sTime [1] 1204554601 > t = as.numeric(sTime) > as.POSIXct(t, origin="1970-01-01") [1] "2008-03-03 14:30:01 EST" <----- no tz option and t is sTime + 5

Hello, I''m having a problem with paginating_find losing the context of the array it''s paginating. For example, URL: http://localhost:3000/companies/1/users/1 <% @tickets = @user.tickets.find(:all, page => {:size => 10, :current => params[:page]}) %> <% for ticket in @tickets %> ... <% end %> <%= paginating_links (@tickets) %>

Hi, I face issue in samba 4.3.11, i loses SMB connection after reaching 60 concurrent connections. In my config i have set max connections for my shares as 150 After rebooting my Linux machine i able to connect to samba. Need help to solve this problem. Regards, Vigneshdhanraj G

I think we can mark this bug closed and check in the patch. Anyone have any concerns/questions before I do? Roy -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ wxruby-Bugs-6144 ] error: cast from ?void*? to ?int? loses precision Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:37:31 -0400 (EDT) From: <noreply at rubyforge.org> To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #6144, was opened at 2006-10-15 00:04

I am trying to allow domains'' memory allocation to be altered by using both the "memory" and "maxmem" options in my config files (i.e. set maxmem to some large value to allow the domain to be resized up to that amount, and memory to set the initial allocation). However I appear to lose potentially quite a large chunk of memory as I use a larger "maxmem"

Hello listmemebers, I have data from two-color microarray expression profiling experiments where 3 whole brain (WB) samples were compared to 3 Mauthner Cells (MC) in a loop design (-> MC #1 -> WB #1 -> MC #2 -> WB #2 -> MC #3 -> WB #3 -> MC #1 ->). In addition to phenotype analysis I would also like to run an individual analysis making all pair-wise comparisons. I'm

On Thursday 16 Jun 2005 09:25, Mark Brown wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm using Asterisk, actually A@H 1.1 with all Grandstream 102 phones. > NAT is not an issue as all including the server have public IP's > > The problem is that the phones keep losing registration with the server. > I have not timed this exactly to see if they drop off with exactly the > same