search for: lores

In netdev common pattern, extack pointer is forwarded to the drivers to be filled with error message. However, the caller can easily overwrite the filled message. Instead of adding multiple "if (!extack->_msg)" checks before any NL_SET_ERR_MSG() call, which appears after call to the driver, let's add new macro to common code. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y9Irgrgf3uxOjwUm at

? 2024/10/16 17:16, Yonatan Maman ??: > > > On 16/10/2024 7:23, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 06:23:44PM +0300, Yonatan Maman wrote: >>> From: Yonatan Maman <Ymaman at Nvidia.com> >>> >>> This patch series aims to enable Peer-to-Peer (P2P) DMA access in >>> GPU-centric applications that utilize RDMA and private device

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi, > > here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous > versions can be found here: > > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ > > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ > > V3:

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi, > > here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous > versions can be found here: > > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ > > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ > > V3:

This this definition: group { "puppettestgroup2": gid => 1235, ensure => present } user { "puppettestuser2": gid => "puppettestgroup2", uid => 1235, ensure => present } I see this: notice: Starting

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 19:07:23 +0800, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 03:34:34 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:13:48AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:43:42 -0700, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu,

Is there a way I can have "voice mail check" calls coming from my internal users automatically get to the right extension, without having the user enter their extension? I'm thinking that I could have the local SPA boxes translate, or have each user live in a context where the extension in question exists uniquely per user, but both of these seem kludgey. Thanks in advance for

Support setting the FDB limit through ip link. The arguments is: - fdb_max_learned: A 32-bit unsigned integer specifying the maximum number of learned FDB entries, with 0 disabling the limit. Also support reading back the current number of learned FDB entries in the bridge by this count. The returned value's name is: - fdb_n_learned: A 32-bit unsigned

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 02:02:33PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 19:07:23 +0800, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 03:34:34 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:13:48AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:43:42 -0700,

On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 04:50:33AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 04:57:11PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > On 14/02/2020 4:04 pm, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > With the built-in topology description in place, x86 platforms can now > > > use the virtio-iommu. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker

On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 04:50:33AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 04:57:11PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > On 14/02/2020 4:04 pm, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > With the built-in topology description in place, x86 platforms can now > > > use the virtio-iommu. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, at 14:26, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:28:58PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > > This is pretty misleading. Isn't Stream just a collection of repos that > > offer pre-release packages for the next RHEL point release? It's not a > > midstream between Fedora and RHEL. > > Along those lines, if someone's

When calling OpenCL clEnqueueSVMMigrateMem() on a region of memory that is backed by pte_none() or zero pages, migrate_vma_setup() will fill the source PFN array with an entry indicating the source page is zero. Use this to optimize migration to device private memory by allocating GPU memory and zero filling it instead of failing to migrate the page. Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:46 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue 25-06-19 12:52:18, Dan Williams wrote: > [...] > > > Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst > > > > That document has failed to preclude symbol export fights in the past > > and there is a reasonable argument to try not to retract functionality > > that had

Statically allocated array of pointed to hwmon_channel_info can be made const for safety. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> --- This depends on hwmon core patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230406203103.3011503-2-krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org/ Therefore I propose this should also go via hwmon tree. Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare at suse.com>

On 5/20/20 12:20 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:36:52AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: >> When calling OpenCL clEnqueueSVMMigrateMem() on a region of memory that >> is backed by pte_none() or zero pages, migrate_vma_setup() will fill the >> source PFN array with an entry indicating the source page is zero. >> Use this to optimize migration to

On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 07:20:20PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > > >On 09.03.2023 19:21, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 01:10:36PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> this patchset evolved from previous v2 version (see link below). It does >>> several updates to virtio/vsock: >>> 1) Changes

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> tu102_gr_load() is completely unused and can be removed to address this warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:2517:1: error: no previous prototype for 'nv50_display_create' Another patch was sent in the meantime to mark the function static but that would just cause a different warning about an unused function. Fixes: 1cd97b5490c8

On 17/02/2020 1:01 pm, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 04:50:33AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 04:57:11PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: >>>> On 14/02/2020 4:04 pm, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >>>>> With the built-in topology

On 17/02/2020 1:01 pm, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 04:50:33AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 04:57:11PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: >>>> On 14/02/2020 4:04 pm, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >>>>> With the built-in topology