search for: lopt

...ile =================================================================== --- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92512) +++ TEST.libcalls.Makefile (working copy) @@ -21,12 +21,11 @@ @cat $< $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt): \ -Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) \ +Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ @echo "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> $@ @echo ">>> ========= '$(RELDIR)/$*' Program" >> $@ @echo "--------------------...

This is what I get while trying to run 'make TEST=libcalls' in the top dir of test-suite: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gregory/thesis/llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gregory/thesis/llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests' make[3]: Entering directory

...======================================== > --- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92512) > +++ TEST.libcalls.Makefile (working copy) > @@ -21,12 +21,11 @@ > @cat $< > > $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt): \ > -Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) \ > +Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) > $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ > @echo > "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> > $@ > @echo ">>> ========= '$(RELDIR)/$*' Program" >> $@ &gt...

....libcalls.Makefile =================================================================== --- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92749) +++ TEST.libcalls.Makefile (working copy) @@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt): \ Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) \ $(PROJ_SRC_ROOT)/TEST.libcalls.Makefile + $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ @echo "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> $@ @echo ">>> ========= '$(RELDIR)/$*' Program" >> $@ @echo "-----------------------------------...

...=============================================================== > --- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92749) > +++ TEST.libcalls.Makefile (working copy) > @@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ > $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt): \ > Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) \ > $(PROJ_SRC_ROOT)/TEST.libcalls.Makefile > + $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ > @echo > "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> > $@ > @echo ">>> ========= '$(RELDIR)/$*' Program" >> $@ > @echo >...

...hort_opts_umb 2014-06-23 19:52:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ check_option(int argc, char *argv[]) char *err = NULL; int n = 0, ind = 0; - const char optstr[] = ":h:s:e:o:t:i:fcp?vV"; + const char optstr[] = ":h:s:e:o:t:i:b:umfcp?vV"; struct option lopt[] = \ { { "entry", required_argument, NULL, 'e' },

> LLVM tools and LLVM-GCC I've built seem to work. > Can it be due to LLVM_SRC_ROOT == LLVM_OBJ_ROOT? No. This is usually due to absence of llvm-gcc. You need reconfigure llvm once again with lvm-gcc path added and make sure it was hooked properly (look into Makefile.config for paths, etc). -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg

...o "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> $@ @echo ">>> ========= '$(RELDIR)/$*' Program" >> $@ @echo "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> $@ - $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ @-$(LOPT) -simplify-libcalls -stats -debug-only=simplify-libcalls \ -time-passes -disable-output $< 2>>$@ summary:

...o build this (from Makefile.programs): # Given an unoptimized bytecode file that is a simple linkage of all # the program's bytecode files, optimize the program using the # standard compilation optimizations. $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.linked.bc): \ Output/%.linked.bc: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) $(VERB) $(RM) -f $(CURDIR)/$@.info -$(LOPT) -std-compile-opts -info-output-file=$(CURDIR)/$@.info $(STATS) $(EXTRA_LOPT_OPTIONS) $< -o $@ -f But for some strange reason it can't find this rule (from Makefile.singlesrc): Output/%.linked.rbc: Output/%.bc -cp -f $<...

After following all steps from http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#testsuiterun, I've got this: make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/projects/test-suite/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests' make[3]: Entering directory

I understood your modules and I see as them can be used in LNT. But there are some question about old features. 1. With Makefiles we can write pass and collect some statistics. There was an example of branch pass. Metrics can be collected by @-$(LOPT) -load dcc888$(SHLIBEXT) -branch-counter -stats \ -time-passes -disable-output $< 2>>$@ in makefile. In report file we write how data should be parsed. Can we do same things now with cmake+lit? 2. As I saw in LNT code there is no opportunity to compile but not execute tests. Some m...

...lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I understood your modules and I see as them can be used in LNT. But there are some question about old features. > 1. With Makefiles we can write pass and collect some statistics. There was an example of branch pass. Metrics can be collected by > @-$(LOPT) -load dcc888$(SHLIBEXT) -branch-counter -stats \ -time-passes -disable-output $< 2>>$@ > in makefile. In report file we write how data should be parsed. Can we do same things now with cmake+lit? This question hits several points at once: - Collecting metrics at compiletime: The Makefi...

Now it's a good time to introduce the new tool 'o2info' since kernel part of OCFS2_IOC_INFO ioctl has been pulld upstream by linus. The following 6 patches have already got sunil's SOBs, and now they're trying to attract more reviewers before it goes to central repo with a modification of getting manual pages being introduced.

...rt_opts_umb 2014-06-22 22:14:03.000000000 +0200 @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ check_option(int argc, char *argv[]) char *err = NULL; int n = 0, ind = 0; - const char optstr[] = ":h:s:e:o:t:i:fcp?vV"; + const char optstr[] = ":h:s:e:o:t:i:u:m:b:fcp?vV"; struct option lopt[] = \ { { "entry", required_argument, NULL, 'e' },

...s/isohybrid.c 2014-06-23 19:52:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ check_option(int argc, char *argv[]) char *err = NULL; int n = 0, ind = 0; - const char optstr[] = ":h:s:e:o:t:i:fcp?vV"; + const char optstr[] = ":h:s:e:o:t:i:b:umfcp?vV"; struct option lopt[] = \ { { "entry", required_argument, NULL, 'e' },

...g the new pass manager"), cl::init(false), cl::Hidden); ... Conf.UseNewPM = UseNewPM; ... projects/clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp ... void clang::EmitBackendOutput( (...) { ... runThinLTOBackend(CombinedIndex.get(), M, HeaderOpts, CGOpts, TOpts, LOpts, std::move(OS), CGOpts.SampleProfileFile, Action); return; ... } static void runThinLTOBackend (...) { ... Conf.UseNewPM = CGOpts.ExperimentalNewPassManager; ... } My team and I were wondering if this is: intentional, if so, why do we not have an option to enable the new PM i...

...t = fileno(stdout); + + ret = console_loop(conspty, in, out, 0); + + restore_term(in, &attr); + + return ret; +} + int main(int argc, char **argv) { - struct termios attr; int domid; - char *sopt = "h"; + char *sopt = "rp:gndh"; int ch; int opt_ind=0; struct option lopt[] = { + { "remote", 0, NULL, ''r'' }, + { "port", 1, NULL, ''p'' }, + { "gateway", 0, NULL, ''g'' }, + { "noecho", 0, NULL, ''n'' }, + { "debug", 0, NULL, ''d'...

Hi, following will be 6 patch proposals for isohybrid.c 1: Encode GPT partition names as UTF-16LE 2: Correct blocking factor in APM partition block counts 3: Correct end block address of first GPT partition 4: Write GPT backup to the very end of the image 5: Change all fseek(3) to fseeko(3) 6: Introduce option --mbr and make isohybrid.c compilable standalone If the form needs adjustments,

> On May 25, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > Thank you for your answer. > But can you answer for some more questions? > First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cmake? As James already said "lnt runtest

...I assume you can reproduce this in a unit test? Well, it doesn`t take a long program-under-compilation to make this fail. As before, I will paste something in after my sign-off. Regards, Abe ----- added near the end of "OptimizeGlobalVars" in "llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp", amongst many other things I added to that routine ----- struct GV_alignment_comparator { bool operator()(const GlobalVariable& L, const GlobalVariable& R) { return L.getAlignment() < R.getAlignment(); } }; if (unsorted) { M.getGlobalList().sort( GV_alignme...