Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "lopiuh".
Did you mean:
lopin
2013 Dec 02
0
hardlinking and -R (multiple source directories)
...eature to add or remove space and can do so by changing ONE
disk ... all other keep their data of the backup set. Next time rsync aud
aufs "recover" only the files which where on the replaced drive.
If anyone has any questions or comments or wishes to test, please feel free
.. please cc (lopiuh at gmail dot com) because I could miss mailing list
entries.
Here are the relevant commands I use:
mount -t aufs -o br=/mnt/mp_drive1=rw:/mnt/mp_drive2=rw:/mnt/mp_drive3=rw
-o sum -o create=mfs -o udba=none none /mnt/aufs
cd srcdir_parrent
nice -n 19 ionice -c3 rsync -RavhSDHi --stats --del src...
2013 Aug 02
2
hardlinking and -R (multiple source directories)
...H) works perfectly while using a syntax like -avhxSDH <SRC>
<DEST>
Now I have to mirror multiple SRC directories which contain hardlinks. e.
g: src1/a is a hardlink to src2/b
-RavhxSDH SRC1 SRC2 DEST
does not preserve hardlink a and b in DEST. Is there any chance to do that?
Thanks
lopiuh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20130803/d732629a/attachment.html>
2013 Apr 06
0
rsync 3.0.9 partial file left after CTRL-C WITHOUT using --partial
...on.
in 50 % the file is left over.
i can reproduce it on a big fat slow (relative to a small ext4
partition on same lvm) xfs-partition.
If i do this on root I even if I manage tp ctrl-c at the right time, I
don't get a temp file left. The test setup is very "clean"
Greetings
Lopiuh
> Is it a new tmp file every time ?? Or is the tmpfile leftover from
> some (probably not reproducible) run? Are you sure there are no
> "stuck" rsync processes running? To be sure, you might run sudo lsof
> on that tmpfile.
>
> Justin
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:0...
2024 Jun 03
1
Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
..........x usr/bin/ping
.d.......a. var/log/journal/
sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec
total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN)
=================
How is that, that "usr/bin/ping" is not included / included in
results? That is no feature, is it?
Yours lopiuh
2013 Dec 02
2
symlink in -R src_dirlist and real dirs on target
...e contents of the directory src1/usr/bin/
I could do bind mounts for src1 and src2 but normaly I try to avoid bind
mounts
How do I mirror the contents of name name changing directories when I want
to use fixed directorynames at destination. My symlink to dir approach was
not successfull.
Thanks
lopiuh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20131202/f1704551/attachment.html>
2013 Apr 05
3
Fwd: rsync 3.0.9 partial file left after CTRL-C WITHOUT using --partial
...010
constructors_destructor_fn_imps.hpp
4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2509 Nov 15 2010 debug_fn_imps.hpp
* 0 -rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 5 12:05 .entry_cmp.hpp.543CXr*
root at yaVDR:~#
It is reproducible, any ideas? (If i do the same with huge files (1 GB) the
partial file GETS deleted!
Thanks
lopiuh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20130405/77bd21c1/attachment.html>
2024 Jun 03
1
Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
...rnal/
>
> sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec
> total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN)
> =================
>
> How is that, that "usr/bin/ping" is not included / included in
> results? That is no feature, is it?
>
> Yours lopiuh
>