search for: loosly

...'m trying to compile dovecot-1.2-managesieve from hg repo with Dovecot v1.2 and I found that managesieve uses another "install" target/prefix than I've configured in Dovecot. Is this intentional? Because you must specify the compiled Dovecot sources, is managesieve just "loosly" connected to Dovecot so it would survive a Dovecot (minor) update, or do I need to compile managesieve each time as well? If I need to compile each time, managesive should default to install into the same directory than Dovecot, shouldn't it? Bye, - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP...

Greetings Everyone, A group in my office is designing/integrating what I would loosly label as an "embedded system". In that, it performs a dedicated task and is not a general purpose workstation or server. It operates in a harsh environment, particularly a questionable power environment and they are extremely concerned about inadvertent shutdown and recovery. They wer...

...name space in XML and incorporate elements from DC with RDF thinking. To argue for the latter: The Atom 1.0 developers choose to abandon the RDF and DC name spaces because they wanted a format that was not cluttered by and requiring multiple name spaces out of the box. They also felt DC was to loosly defined. (Note that RDF and DC combined in the case of a web feed format would end up being little more than W3C's RSS 1.0 specification. Cluttered and unendorsed.) [1] See http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-xml-guidelines/ and http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmes-xml/ to get the general i...

Hi all. I have currently a task to implement a network traffic analyzer. Some years ago I've used NTOP for that purpose, I would also like to test some alternatives. Which alternatives can you recommend and why? Thanks ;) Best regards, Rafa? Radecki.

...trunk/java/... > Fortunately, with SVN, making such a change isn't hard and its tracked > in the commits. Anyone object or have other ideas in this realm? I strongly dislike this approach. This is particularly bad because we have many subprojects. Lots of these subprojects are only loosly coupled to LLVM: things like llvm-tv, llvm-java, llvm-poolalloc, etc. I think that it is natural for subprojects to go through various development phases and to sink or swim based on their own merits and the contributor base around them. Our goal should be to make it as easy as possible to che...

What I've gotten out of this discussion so far: 1) we need to introduce a means in which to do captions; this could be done through adding a "caption" element to CMML, or in another time-continuous annotation format; so far I am not sure which would be the better way 2) we need a XML annotation format for audio - in particular for music - that is more structured than vorbiscomment

I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & Exchange systems. I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. Grounded in SCO UNIX (the real SCO UNIX). We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell poweredge 400SC server. This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SATA 250 GB disks. We want to use this server w/CentOS5, to provide file and print resources to 100

All, I'm finding the current layout a bit frustrating, not to mention that it breaks all the documentation. We currently have modules laid out like this: llvm/trunk/... llvm/branches/... llvm/tags/... stacker/trunk/... stacker/branches/... stacker/tags/... and similarly for all the other modules (test-suite, java, poolalloc, etc.). Unfortunately, this "standard"

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with downloading stuff (hence packet dropping to slow rates), and I can set the max download rate to within a few kbyte/sec of the maximum and still keep near m...