search for: looser

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1990 Bug #: 1990 Summary: sftp segfaults when tab-completing a directory which contains umlauts Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

...ensible solution is to continue checking those tests > with the same flag > as at the time when the reference output has been recorded. We don't want to lose the more-stringent test coverage just because that no longer might be the default mode. We'll also want, where practical, some looser test mode that will work regardless of the FP contraction setting. Both are important. -Hal > > Thanks, > Sebastian > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev...

Does anyone know of a hardware adapter that can take ISDN BRI frames (I.430) and encapsulate them in Ethernet (any form, but TDMoE would be really cool), in much the same way that the redfone does for PRI? (yes I have asked this before in looser terms, but it was a while ago :) Would anyone find such a device useful? Thanks James

...gcc 4.7.4 - llvm git commit 98a1ca117e6743dd7f2d505443a96f591d083eab Build log: Scanning dependencies of target LLVMLTO [ 53%] Building CXX object lib/LTO/CMakeFiles/LLVMLTO.dir/Caching.cpp.o /tmp/pkgs/llvm/lib/LTO/Caching.cpp: In lambda function: /tmp/pkgs/llvm/lib/LTO/Caching.cpp:74:7: error: looser throw specifier for 'virtual llvm::lto::localCache(std::string, llvm::lto::AddFileFn)::<lambda(unsigned int, llvm::StringRef)>::CacheStream::~CacheStream()' In file included from /tmp/pkgs/llvm/include/llvm/LTO/Caching.h:18:0, from /tmp/pkgs/llvm/lib/LTO/Caching.cpp:1...

...id) > + > +This optional callback is called after all the configuration has been > +passed to the plugin. It can be used to force a stricter thread model > +based on configuration, compared to C<THREAD_MODEL>. See L</THREADS> > +below for details. Attempts to request a looser (more parallel) model > +are silently ignored. > + > +If there is an error, C<.thread_model> should call C<nbdkit_error> > +with an error message and return C<-1>. Two comments: (1) Do we have an opportunity to change the way the thread model is specified to allow fu...

Hello, http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#software lists "GCC >=4.7.0" among requirements for building LLVM. However, my attempt of building LLVM+Clang with gcc 4.7.3 has failed with a multitude of errors, such as: lib/LTO/Caching.cpp:74:7: error: looser throw specifier for 'virtual llvm::lto::localCache(std::string, llvm::lto::AddFileFn)::<lambda(unsigned int, llvm::StringRef)>::CacheStream::~CacheStream()' In file included from LTO/Caching.h:18:0, from LTO/Caching.cpp:14: LTO/LTO.h:271:11: error: overriding 'v...

...gt; +This optional callback is called after all the configuration has been >> +passed to the plugin. It can be used to force a stricter thread model >> +based on configuration, compared to C<THREAD_MODEL>. See L</THREADS> >> +below for details. Attempts to request a looser (more parallel) model >> +are silently ignored. >> + >> +If there is an error, C<.thread_model> should call C<nbdkit_error> >> +with an error message and return C<-1>. > > Two comments: > > (1) Do we have an opportunity to change the way the t...

...a spat of people who keep re-sending the same message over and over until they get the kind of reply they want. I'm wondering what the people here -- especially the regulars -- think about this whole issue. One option I'm considering is to make the "syslinux" mailing list a looser scope, and create a separate "syslinux-devel" mailing list for the hardcore development work. However, none of this is useful if there is no community to go with it; and experience has shown that newbies with questions will happily spam whatever lists they think will give them the ans...

...he resulting ssh plugin may already require a stronger license than what nbdkit proper allows, but the license of the .so plugin being stronger than the license of the .c files does not require the same level of care as when the license of one .c file prevents refactoring code out from there into a looser licensed .c file elsewhere. > +++ b/plugins/ssh/ssh.c > @@ -0,0 +1,521 @@ > +/* nbdkit > + * Copyright (C) 2014-2019 Red Hat Inc. > + * All rights reserved. I've always found it funny to consider how "All rights reserved" is compatible with the later statements that m...

...s root@zombie:/tmp/ext2patched> real 0m4.341s user 0m1.890s sys 0m1.010s root@zombie:/tmp/reiser> real 1m54.355s user 0m2.060s sys 1m50.370s root@zombie:/tmp/ext3> I don't remember the result of ext2 before patching, it was about 1.45s IIRC. You see, ext3 is the looser and needs about 10000 percent more CPU time. I looked at the similar routines in ext3 code and it may be optimised too, but I am not familiar with the code so I don't want to start experimenting on the kernel. The ext2 patch is attached. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- "Programmieren ist kalt...

Hi, I discovered yesterday that the instructions given at http://www.openssh.org/faq.html#3.14 regarding the correct permissions for the authorized_keys file mistakenly recommend chmod'ing the file to 600 when it should be 644. The requirement for public key authentication to work is in fact that ~/.ssh/authorized_keys is readable (but not writable) by group and other, not just owner. Someone

...tions that can be executed in parallel but also sequentially". In some architectures, the sequential execution might break the schedule due to visible function unit pipeline latencies and no hardware interlocking. Is it wise to mix the two concepts of "parallel instructions" and the looser "instructions that should be executed together"? The "parallel semantics" implies changes to how the scheduling is done (the earliest/latest cycle where an instruction can be scheduled) and also, e.g., the register allocation's live ranges (if allocating regs on a "pack...

...ethernet connection" for the dummy NICs. Close, but requires extra permissions for accessing /dev/net/tun, and technically feels a little inferior to using a peerless network device like above. * TCP tunnel server. Even more inferior, does not require extra permissions but leaves even looser ends (listening sockets). Also, the RelaxNG grammal does not let me specify a model for this interface type, so maintaining bus order with respect to the virtio interfaces is impossible. A grammar bug? * Using a dummy VLAN in the bridge. This is what I temporarily settled for, but this...

Hi, I''m using a expectation like this : repository.should_receive(:add_gem).with("test.txt", :anything) When I run my spec, it fails with the following message : Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ''MiniGemServer should add a new gem to the repository after it has been uploaded'' #<MiniGemServer::Repository:0xb11164> expected :add_gem with

libguestfs (an LGPLv2+ library) uses the 'hash' module, which turns out to be "GPL". Actually this happened because we started to use it in a separate GPL'd utility program, but later on included this functionality in the core library, copying the same code from the utility but not checking the license of 'hash'. We'd therefore like to request that

Rich pointed out that making thread_model dynamic even for plugins makes some sense, so here is the code for doing it for 'sh'. I'm less confident on how to do it for OCaml and Rust (not to mention that those allow the plugin to already compile in their model, rather than the language binding glue forcing a model). The other languages (lua, perl, python, ruby) still need to be

Corrado Zoccolo wrote: > Unfortunately, it seems that llvm-c interface lacks major > functionalities, e.g. getting a pointer to a jit-ted function. > It is easy to write a small c++ wrapper to expose the functionality > that one wants (llvm-py does it for the many optimization passes not > available through c binding), but I wonder if it is possible to have a > simpler &

...already require a stronger license than what nbdkit proper allows, but >> the license of the .so plugin being stronger than the license of the .c >> files does not require the same level of care as when the license of one >> .c file prevents refactoring code out from there into a looser licensed >> .c file elsewhere. > > The current (libssh2) block/ssh.c has: > <snip> > > Anyway I think that's compatible? Sounds like a BSD license, so you should be good. (Not all of qemu is BSD licensed, so my gut reaction to copying from qemu is to do ask - if...

Can we get this guy booted off the list somehow? > -----Original Message----- > From: MAILER-DAEMON@smtp.register.it [mailto:MAILER- > DAEMON@smtp.register.it] > Sent: Thursday, 12 May 2005 8:36 AM > To: Dean Collins > Subject: failure notice > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtp.register.it. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the

...ore than 1 domain at a time. So a user could go to log on and get to local computer or a couple of domains rather than a single domain? I cann't find anything in the docs. WHen I tried it the second domain replaced the first :-( Just an idea I had to make life a bit easier but looks like a looser. If anybody knows for certain I'd appreciate it Thanks Ashley