search for: loopverifi

Hi, I am writing a loop pass to replace the backedge with an edge from latch to exit. Now I just replace the terminator of latch with another BranchInst, and the loop will not be a loop after my pass. However, it turns out a failure of loopverify after executing my pass: opt: ~/llvm/llvm-trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopInfoImpl.h:297: void llvm::LoopBase<N, M>::verifyLoop() const [with

On May 7, 2013, at 8:26 PM, zhiyuan yang <sjtu.yzy at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing a loop pass to replace the backedge with an edge from latch to exit. > Now I just replace the terminator of latch with another BranchInst, and the loop will not be a loop after my pass. However, it turns out a failure of loopverify after executing my pass: > > opt:

Sorry for forgetting to reply all... It works! Thank you very much! But I also wonder how do you know this function will work while there are no documents noticing that. I try learning LLVM by reading its code, but soon feel lost in so many functions. Just like I have many tools, but don't know which to use and what difference it could make. Is there some better ways to learn LLVM? On Wed,

...not link with LoopInfo from the Analysis code module. My question are: * Is it a good idea to detect misplaced llvm.loop metadata or should we protect us from faulty rewrites in some other way? * Is the Verifier a good place for this kind of checks, or is there a better place (such as the LoopVerifier pass, but I guess that is not always run before CFG simplification etc)? * Would it be correct to use LoopInfo, or can we do the checks in some other way? /Björn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attac...