Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "loopbreak".
2005 Oct 12
3
How to install R 2.2.0 Debian 'unstable' package in otherwise 'sarge' system
...ng and then
apt-get install r-base. This results in
[... full output at bottom of email ...]
E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential
package e2fsprogs due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This is often bad,
but if you really want to do it, activate the APT::Force-LoopBreak option.
E: Internal Error, Could not early remove e2fsprogs
which scares me into desisting with this course of action.
(ii) apt-get install -t unstable r-base, but it replies that
r-base is already the newest version. Have I not invoked this command
correctly, or does the -t switch not do what...
2007 Dec 14
21
Some silly benchs (was: 1.9)
Guys,
Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much
overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions.
the benchmark script and the results:
http://pastie.caboo.se/128646
The naive C extension:
http://pastie.caboo.se/128647
I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk.
What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8