search for: loopbacks

Hi, Running: Freebsd 6.0 I am wondering if it is possible to have acces to loopback ip in a jail. I currently have a server running a jail. In the jail, there is a database and a web server. I would like to be able to have the database only bind on a loopback address and not on the jail's ip. Can this be done and how? Thanks -Cyril

On 2/11/2016 5:14 AM, lejeczek wrote: > nobody does use iscsi loopback over an lvm? I'm not sure what 'iscsi loopback' even means. iSCSI is used to mount a virtual block device hosted on another system (initiator mode) or to share a virtual block device (target mode), while loopback is used to mount a local file as a device, such as an .iso image of an optical disc. can you

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 11:37 AM > > > > You already mentioned that you are working on a fix for loopback > > > > here for the guest, but presumably a host could also do loopback. > > > > > > IIUC we don't support loopback in the host, because in this case the > > >

Hi, I am new to DTrace. Want to capture (for specific port #s) the loopback interface (lo0) tcp message flow with the complete message body. Is this possible with DTrace? Are any examples available? Thanks, Joe ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.

Hello List, After demystifying the cause for my /sbin/ifup-local not being executed by network scripts for an Ethernet interface (don't let NetworkManager control it or ifup-local won't be executed)... ... I have a question with hopefully a simple answer: I placed an alias/description on my interface during testing and now I want to remove it. But when I try to remove it, I'm either

Hello-- I'm trying to use extlinux to make a bootable disk image, but I've hit a wall. I've got a partitioned hard disk image with one ext2 partition in it. I've mounted the partition through a block loopback device (/dev/loop1 on the host) and chrooted into it in order to run extlinux. Within the chroot environment, /etc/mtab says: /dev/hda1 / ext2 rw 0 0 ...and within the

> I recently did something like this. I have a webserver in a jail that > needs to talk to a database, and the webserver is the only thing that > should talk to the databse. > My solution was to use 2 jails: one for the webserver, and another for the > database. > Jail 1: > * runs webserver > * binds to real interface with real, routable IP > Jail 2: > *

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:01 PM > This series introduces a new transport (vsock_loopback) to handle > local communication. > This could be useful to test vsock core itself and to allow developers > to test their applications without launching a VM. > > Before this series, vmci and virtio transports

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:01 PM > This series introduces a new transport (vsock_loopback) to handle > local communication. > This could be useful to test vsock core itself and to allow developers > to test their applications without launching a VM. > > Before this series, vmci and virtio transports

Hi, I''m experiencing some troubles with an application in a VM (domain-1) which needs to connect too itself via the loopback interface. It seems that the connection process hang during the TCP handshake. I have a running web server in this VM which run perfectly. Logged in Domain-1, i''ve tried to reach the webserver with telnet but the same problem happens. Even pinging the

I want tinc to listen locally on loopback, so that port 655 is not exposed on any system interfaces. Can't tinc make outbound connections when listening on loopback? I can't see any reason why it should. This system will never have other tinc daemons connect to it, it will only ever connect to other tinc daemons in order to establish a VPN connection. -- Jonny Tyers On Sat, 17 Nov 2018

Package: xen-utils-3.2-1 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: normal When a DomU is defined as using a file: device the loopback driver will be used to make it appear to be a regular block device. The loopback driver will by default only support 8 nodes so this is a limited resource. http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/10/22/kernel-issues-with-debian-xen-and-centos-kernels/ If there is a problem that prevents

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 4:22 PM > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:04:18PM +0000, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:01 PM > > > To: netdev at vger.kernel.org > > > > > > This patch

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 4:22 PM > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:04:18PM +0000, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:01 PM > > > To: netdev at vger.kernel.org > > > > > > This patch

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > This series introduces a new transport (vsock_loopback) to handle > local communication. > This could be useful to test vsock core itself and to allow developers > to test their applications without launching a VM. > > Before this series, vmci and virtio transports allowed this behavior, > but only in the

.. what is? fellow centosians. how to you mount your loopback targets? I'm trying lvm backstore, I was hoping I would do it with uuid, but it's exposed more than once and how would kernel decide which device to use I don't know. thanks

Is there an existing RFE for, what I''ll wrongly call, "recursively visable snapshots"? That is, .zfs in directories other than the dataset root. Frankly, I don''t need it available in all directories, although it''d be nice, but I do have a need for making it visiable 1 dir down from the dataset root. The problem is that while ZFS and Zones work smoothly

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 6:18 PM > To: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/14] vsock: add multi-transports support > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:53:39PM +0000, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > > >

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 6:18 PM > To: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/14] vsock: add multi-transports support > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:53:39PM +0000, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > > >

Hi to the ML. I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult. I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that. May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp