Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "loop_outer".
2020 Jun 24
6
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>:
> > As mentioned in the Differential, generating the tests automatically
> > will lose information about what actually is intended to be tested,
>
> Agreed - and I didn't mean to suggest tests should be automatically
> generated. I work pretty hard in code reviews to encourage tests to
2019 Jan 31
4
Confusing ERROR with LoopAccessLegacyAnalysis: Pass 'Unnamed pass: implement Pass::getPassName()' is not initialized.
Dear all,
I write a new LoopPass which wants to use passes including LoopInfoWrapperPass, ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass and LoopAccessLegacyAnalysis.
Therefore, I implement the following code based on LLVM 9.0.0:
=====================================================================
bool LoopInformationCollect::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &)
{
auto &SE =
2020 Jul 01
6
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
...numbers from
> parallel-loop-md-merge.ll, are:
>
> 68 ; CHECK: store double 4.200000e+01, {{.*}} !llvm.access.group
> ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3:[0-9]+]]
> 69 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond.i, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_INNER:[0-9]+]]
> 70 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]
> 71
> 72 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3]] =
> !{![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER:[0-9]+]], ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]}
> 73 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER]] = distinct !{}
> 74 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER]] = distinct !{}
> 75 ; CHECK: ![[LOOP_INNER]] =...
2020 Jul 01
5
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
...nes, annotated with their line numbers from parallel-loop-md-merge.ll, are:
68 ; CHECK: store double 4.200000e+01, {{.*}} !llvm.access.group ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3:[0-9]+]]
69 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond.i, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_INNER:[0-9]+]]
70 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]
71
72 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3]] = !{![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER:[0-9]+]], ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]}
73 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER]] = distinct !{}
74 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER]] = distinct !{}
75 ; CHECK: ![[LOOP_INNER]] = distinct !{![[LOOP_INNER]], ![...