search for: loop_inn

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "loop_inn".

Did you mean: loop_cnt
2020 Jun 24
6
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > As mentioned in the Differential, generating the tests automatically > > will lose information about what actually is intended to be tested, > > Agreed - and I didn't mean to suggest tests should be automatically > generated. I work pretty hard in code reviews to encourage tests to
2020 Jul 01
6
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
...; their values from?) > > The CHECK lines, annotated with their line numbers from > parallel-loop-md-merge.ll, are: > >     68 ; CHECK: store double 4.200000e+01, {{.*}} !llvm.access.group > ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3:[0-9]+]] >     69 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond.i, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_INNER:[0-9]+]] >     70 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_OUTER:[0-9]+]] >     71 >     72 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3]] = > !{![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER:[0-9]+]], ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]} >     73 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER]] = distinct !{} >     74 ; CHECK:...
2020 Jul 01
5
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
...CESSES_INNER/ACCESS_GROUP_INNER have their values from?) The CHECK lines, annotated with their line numbers from parallel-loop-md-merge.ll, are: 68 ; CHECK: store double 4.200000e+01, {{.*}} !llvm.access.group ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3:[0-9]+]] 69 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond.i, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_INNER:[0-9]+]] 70 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_OUTER:[0-9]+]] 71 72 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3]] = !{![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER:[0-9]+]], ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]} 73 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER]] = distinct !{} 74 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER]] = disti...