search for: loooping

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "loooping".

Did you mean: looping
2017 Jun 13
0
[FORGED] IF LOOOP
On 14/06/17 08:46, matthias worni wrote: > Hey > > This should be a rather simple quesiton for some of you. I want to make > some progress in looping... > I have the vector r, which contains single values --> see below: > > r > [1] 1.1717118 1.1605215 1.1522907 1.1422830 1.1065277 1.1165451 1.1163768 > 1.1048872 1.0848836 1.0627211 > [11] 1.0300964 1.0296879
2017 Jun 13
3
IF LOOOP
Hey This should be a rather simple quesiton for some of you. I want to make some progress in looping... I have the vector r, which contains single values --> see below: r [1] 1.1717118 1.1605215 1.1522907 1.1422830 1.1065277 1.1165451 1.1163768 1.1048872 1.0848836 1.0627211 [11] 1.0300964 1.0296879 1.0308194 1.0518188 1.0657229 1.0685514 1.0914881 1.1042577 1.1039351 1.0880163 I would
2009 Oct 13
7
lapply() reccursively
Hi all, I was wondering whether it is possible to use the lapply() function to alter the value of the input, something in the spirit of : a1<-runif(100) a2<-function(i){ a1[i]<-a1[i-1]*a1[i];a1[i] } a3<-lapply(2:100,a2) Something akin to a for() loop, but using the lapply() infrastructure. I haven't been able to get rapply() to do this. The reason is that the "real"
2005 Jul 12
1
allocation of large matrix failing
Hello, this is probably something silly which I am doing, but I cannot understand why this allocation is not happening. Here is a my C code which tries to allocate a list of size 333559, and then a matrix of size 8*333559 I thought I might be running into memory problems, but R is not even using that much (I start R with more memory and it stays constant) Also, I start R as I normally do and I
2012 Apr 20
1
[PATCH v2 0/2] fix "perf top" soft lockups under Xen
v2: - fix compile issues if no CONFIG_SMP, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk - move inc_irq_stat after irq_work_run These 2 patches fixed the "perf top" soft lockups under Xen reported by Steven at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/9/506 Both Steven and I tested it and "perf top" works well now. The soft lockup code path is: __irq_work_queue arch_irq_work_raise
2012 Apr 15
0
(no subject)
Hi all, These 2 patches try to fix the "perf top" soft lockups under Xen reported by Steven at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/9/506 I tested it with 3.4-rc2 and "perf top" works well now. Steven, Could you please help to test it too? The soft lockup code path is: __irq_work_queue arch_irq_work_raise apic->send_IPI_self(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR); apic_send_IPI_self
2012 Apr 15
0
Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix "perf top" soft lockups under Xen
(Forgot mail subject, add it) On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Lin Ming <mlin@ss.pku.edu.cn> wrote: > Hi all, > > These 2 patches try to fix the "perf top" soft lockups under Xen > reported by Steven at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/9/506 > > I tested it with 3.4-rc2 and "perf top" works well now. > > Steven, > Could you please help to test it
2004 Aug 06
3
Moving clients and JOrbis
Here is what I'm trying to do: most of the time, I broadcast from a playlist, just loooping through prerecorded content. Sometimes, say at a special concert or sports game, a live stream (from a laptop's line-in) is broadcast instead. Ideally, the laptop could simply "take over" the stream from IceS, and hand it back when we're finished with the live stuff. Is there a...