search for: looooots

Hello, I have the following sample dataset. sex <- as.factor(c(rep(0,12),rep(1,12))) char <-

Am 5/12/20 um 5:08 PM schrieb pavlos: > Hi Andrew, > > It was a really great fun for me to hunt for the root-cause, and I am > very satisfied I managed it. Although it was the very first time for me > to do it this way - I am an old-fashioned (and retired) programmer, from > before the era of git. > Yes, it was my private time - I've written in my initial email that this

On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 01:56 +0200, pavlos wrote: > niedz., 10 maj 2020 o 01:26 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> > napisa?(a): > > Currently 4.12.3 is scheduled for 19 May: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Release_Planning_for_Samba_4.12#Samba_4.12.3 > > > > As Ralph has a patch and you have confirmed it odds are pretty good > > this

Hi Andrew, It was a really great fun for me to hunt for the root-cause, and I am very satisfied I managed it. Although it was the very first time for me to do it this way - I am an old-fashioned (and retired) programmer, from before the era of git. Yes, it was my private time - I've written in my initial email that this is my home network. I switched to the world of Linux already a couple of

I am starting to see a few issues with OCFS and 9.2.0.3 RAC on redHat Linux AS 2.1. Wondering if there is anyone out there experiencing similar issues... a few pointers to the issues.. 1. OCFS read/write performance is way lower than a read/write to a raw device.. i can give you some comparison numbers.. 2. Writes to shared disk with ocfs would get locked up by one server.. it doesnt have to

I am starting to see a few issues with OCFS and 9.2.0.3 RAC on redHat Linux AS 2.1. Wondering if there is anyone out there experiencing similar issues... a few pointers to the issues.. 1. OCFS read/write performance is way lower than a read/write to a raw device.. i can give you some comparison numbers.. 2. Writes to shared disk with ocfs would get locked up by one server.. it doesnt have to

Greeting All I am using Filebench benchmark in an "Interactive mode" to test ZFS performance with randomread wordload. My Filebench setting & run results are as follwos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ filebench> set $filesize=5g filebench> set $dir=/hdd/fs32k filebench> set $iosize=32k filebench> set