search for: lookup_multi

...fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even delete the extra mails. > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ? >> and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in all folders. In that case the boxes[] would contain a list of user's all folders, except Trash and Spam. If...

...gt; fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even delete the extra mails. > > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ? and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in all folders. In that case the boxes[] would contain a list of user's all folders, except Trash and Spam. If...

...;t even </div> <div> delete the extra mails. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see </div> <div> below) ?and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that </div> <div> backend dependent ? </div> <div> This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for </div> <div> example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in <...

...gt; fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even delete the extra mails. > > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ? and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in all folders. In that case the boxes[] would contain a list of user's all folders, except Trash and Spam. If...

...in the index. fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even delete the extra mails. Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ?and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in all folders. In that case the boxes[] would contain a list of user's all folders, except Trash and Spam. If...

...her FTS backends are lazy and simply >> rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even >> delete the extra mails. >> >> Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see >> below) ?and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that >> backend dependent ? >> This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for >> example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in >> all folders. In that case the boxes[] would contain a list of user's...

and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? Would- nt the below function below be the same for any backend ? Waiting fro your feedback on all those questions Thank you JM ----------------- static int fts_backend_xapian_lookup_multi(struct fts_backend *_backend, struct mailbox *const boxes[], struc...

...lements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply > rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even > delete the extra mails. > > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see > below) ?and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that > backend dependent ? > This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for > example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in > all folders. In that case the boxes[] would contain a list of user's all > folde...