Displaying 20 results from an estimated 188472 matches for "lookes".
Did you mean:
looked
2012 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
Hi All,
I am first time trying build CLANG+LLVM using cmake+ninja build
system. I updated all my CLANG+LLVM sources to current trunk, and I
successfully built it using classic *make* build system. But, trying
to build the same with cmake+ninja build system resulting in following
build failures for compiler-rt sources.
Am I missing something basics here?
====================
cmake command used:
2012 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff.
Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I
don't think that's terribly viable here. We should be able to build ubsan's
runtime with standards conforming code unless there is some fairly extreme
reason not to...
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:
2012 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
I use latest cmake+ninja which are built from latest sources.
=================================
> cmake --version
cmake version 2.8.9.20121011-g2876
=================================
--
mahesha
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am first time trying build CLANG+LLVM using cmake+ninja build
> system. I updated all
2006 Aug 02
1
nut-usb fink version
Charles Lepple wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Didrik Pinte <dpinte@itae.be> wrote:
> > Le mercredi 02 ao=FBt 2006 =E0 08:08 -0400, Charles Lepple a =E9crit :
> > > On 8/2/06, Didrik Pinte <dpinte@itae.be> wrote:
>
> > > Can you start the driver like this: "/sw/bin/newhidups -u root -DDD"
> > > and paste some of the output?
> >
> > Here
2012 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff.
>
> Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I
> don't think that's terribly viable here.
Just out of curiosity - why isn't that viable? I'd sort of hope to
treat optional sanitizer runtimes
2011 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Clang stopped compiling?
On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get
> this error on multiple systems :
Linking, not compiling, but still.
I am getting a similar error when building this morning.
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
> "clang::Sema::checkPseudoObjectRValue(clang::Expr*)", referenced
2012 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:09 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff.
> >
> > Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I
> > don't think that's terribly viable
2011 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Clang stopped compiling?
Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get
this error on multiple systems :
(Compiling with gcc):
llvm[4]: Compiling cc1_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
llvm[4]: Compiling cc1as_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
llvm[4]: Compiling driver.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang
2018 May 14
1
Unable to build 'lld' on Mac OS 10.9
Hi All,
I am trying to build the 'lld' linker on Mac OS 10.9, but during the build, I am getting the errors. Following are the steps that I have followed:
1. I have downloaded the ‘llvm-stable’ source code from the following location:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/tree/stable
2. Machine details(on which llvm source code isbeing built) are as follows:
$ sw_vers
2013 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Reminder] LLVM 3.4 Release Branching
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:46:47PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > This file is for configure+make build, not CMake, so I'm not sure why
> > it's being included into your build (these failures aren't
> > reproducible for me).
> > Can you please list the exact steps you're doing to build
2013 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Reminder] LLVM 3.4 Release Branching
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:46:47PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> This file is for configure+make build, not CMake, so I'm not sure why
> it's being included into your build (these failures aren't
> reproducible for me).
> Can you please list the exact steps you're doing to build LLVM with
> CMake and make sure you don't have additional CFLAGS (LDFLAGS etc)
2012 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:09 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff.
>> >
>> >
2013 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Reminder] LLVM 3.4 Release Branching
+Bob Wilson
I don't know if this is a recent Apple regression, or if it's now catching
something which had always been invalid.
-bw
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:46:47PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > > This
2019 Sep 17
2
Building LLVM with LLVM with no dependence on GCC
Hi folks!
I'm trying to get rid of any dependency on libgcc*, but without success so
far. The following commands were executed on a freshliy installed and updated
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS:
=== snip ===
sudo apt-get install build-essential libffi-dev cmake # see aptget.txt for packages installed
sudo mv /usr/local /usr/local.orig
git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
cd llvm-project; git
2016 Feb 25
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
Hi,
I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and
wanted to speedup my build.
In my build-script I use...
CMAKE_JOBS="1"
##CMAKE_JOBS=$(($(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)+1))
JOBS_CMAKE_OPTS="-DLLVM_PARALLEL_COMPILE_JOBS=$CMAKE_JOBS
-DLLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS=$CMAKE_JOBS"
[1] says in "LLVM-specific variables" section...
***
2013 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Reminder] LLVM 3.4 Release Branching
This file is for configure+make build, not CMake, so I'm not sure why
it's being included into your build (these failures aren't
reproducible for me).
Can you please list the exact steps you're doing to build LLVM with
CMake and make sure you don't have additional CFLAGS (LDFLAGS etc)
defined?
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>
2017 Mar 05
3
Error in Windows build from release_40 branch
Hi,
I'm trying to do a build and install on Windows 10 with Visual Studio
2015 Community Edition for the X86 and ARM targets, from the current
release_40 branch. While compilation completes without error, the
INSTALL target fails with the following error:
54> CMake Error at
projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/cmake_install.cmake:34 (file):
54> file INSTALL cannot find
54>
2019 Sep 20
2
Building LLVM with LLVM with no dependence on GCC
Thus wrote David Demelier via llvm-dev:
> Also you will need to add more options to the components. See for example:
>
> LIBCXX_CXX_ABI=libcxxabi
> LIBCXX_USE_COMPILER_RT=On
> LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER=On
> LIBCXXABI_USE_COMPILER_RT=On
> LIBCXX_HAS_GCC_S_LIB=Off
> LIBUNWIND_USE_COMPILER_RT=On
>
> And as mentioned above
>
> CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB=libc++
2017 Mar 25
5
Modules Maintaining or Removing
Hallo all,
I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES
just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag.
It didn't work as I almost expected.
So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore?
If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that
cmake option also removed?
2006 Apr 14
1
Mustek Powermust 600USB and newhidups
So, I have this Mustek Powermust 600USB (no serial port) here
temporarily. It seems to be a hid device.
The output from "lsusb -v" and "newhidups -DDDDD" (with "generic" and
"vendorid=06da") are (respectively):
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 06da:0003 Phoenixtec Power