search for: longrunning

Hi All, I am fairly new to Ruby and backgroundRB. I am trying to run a simple example in Windows to get my feet wet with backgroundRB and am running into an ''uninitialized constant'' error when I invoke the controller on my rails app. In ''MyTest'' Controller ------------------- def longrun session[:job_key] = MiddleMan.new_worker(:class =>

Hi all, I have a newbie question: If I have a function with the following documentation: ca.jo(x, type = c("eigen", "trace"), ecdet = c("none", "const", "trend"), K = 2, spec=c("longrun", "transitory"), season = NULL, dumvar = NULL) Let's take "type" as an example... if I omit this parameter when calling the

Good Evening, I recently purchased an EPYC quantum UPS. I installed NUT on the home assistant by connecting the UPS via USB and tried all the various drivers in the list, the only one that seems to work is: usbhid-ups with this log: s6-rc: info: service s6rc-oneshot-runner: starting s6-rc: info: service s6rc-oneshot-runner successfully started s6-rc: info: service base-addon-banner: starting

Dear contributors I have tried this experiment: x<-c() for (i in 1:12){ x[i]<-list(cbind(x1[i],x2[i])) #this is a list of 12 couples of time series I am using to perform a test } # that compares them 2 by 2 # ################# #trace statistic test<-data.frame() cval<-array( , dim=c(2,3,12)) for (i in 2:12){ for (k in 1:2){ for (j in 1:3){ result[k,j,i]<-

I can't figure out how to get the "summary" method in the URCA package to work. E.g. when I use the following code fragment in the help for the "ca.jo" function, it always tries to use the "summary" method from the "base" package, not the "urca" package. How do I force it use the "summary" method of the "urca" package?

Dear All, My question is: how can I estimate VECM system with "unrestricted trend" (aka "case 5") option as a deterministic term? As far as I know, ca.jo in urca package allows for "restricted trend" only [vecm <- ca.jo(data, type = "trace"/"eigen", ecdet = "trend", K = n, spec = "transitory"/"longrun")].

Dear Colleague I am trying to figure out how to use R to do OLS restricted VECM regression. However, there are some notation I cannot understand. Please tell me what is 'ect', 'sd' and 'LRM.dl1 in the following practice: #OLS retricted VECM regression data(denmark) sjd <- denmark[, c("LRM", "LRY", "IBO", "IDE")] sjd.vecm<-

----- Forwarded Message ----- From: vramaiah at neo.tamu.edu To: "bernhard pfaff" <bernhard.pfaff at pfaffikus.de> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:03:11 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Use of R for VECM Hello Fellow R'ers I am a new user of R and I am applying it for solving Bi-Variate (Consumption and Output) VECM with Co-Integration (I(1)) with three lags on

Hi, I am working on using LLVM to compile parts of longrunning PostgreSQL queries into native code for faster code execution. As postgres is, nearly, entirely written in C and has long-lived (5 years) supported branches (making the higher API stability important), I'm currently using the C API. I started out using MCJIT but it looks like that's slowl...

I am trying to run a conintegration analysis. I am a former user of S-Plus and understand the output of the coint and VECM output, but I am having trouble understanding the equivalent output in R. Here is what I ran > coint=ca.jo(data,constant=T,K=2,spec="longrun") > summary(coint) The first portion of the output that I did not understand [,1] [,2] [,3] y1

Hello Anyone know how can I calculate the value of the beta parameter when I know the number of cointegrating relationships between two variables. I mean, I using the procedure: ca.jo I do the following: summary (ca.jo (UR [, c (2.52)], type = "trace" ECDET = "trend", K = 2, spec = "longrun")) given that there is a cointegration relationship as I can get the

Dear R users, I am quite new to R, so most of the problems I've encountered working with it are technical, absurd or simple things. Sorry. Despite this, I am struggling with cajolst function for a day and still nothing. The problem is that I can't get an estimate for the break point (which is in the slot "bpoint") by using cajolst function. Finally, I've tried Johansen and

I am going over: ftp://ftp.oqo.com/unsupported/linux/OQOLinux.html This is for the 'older' model 1, I have the model 2. The files are 18 mo old, and relate to kernel 2.6.10. Of course I want to avoid a custom kernel, but please help me understand what is being covered here: "2. Enable crusoe processor in kernel .config CONFIG_MCRUSOE=y" What is the crusoe processor? 3.

...o dom0. I think a fully general interface based purely on MSRs makes that difficult in a number of ways: * Currently I don't think there is any way in Xen to cause MSR accesses to be passed to toolstack support programs. * In some configurations, Xen PV domains do not have a suitable longrunning service process to handle requests of this kind. * MSR reads of this kind might be expected to be fast but if they involve trapping to a service domain they might be very slow. * This interface is very x86-specific. It seems to me that the real need for this facility is to provide a good s...

...interface based purely on MSRs makes that > difficult in a number of ways: > > * Currently I don't think there is any way in Xen to cause MSR > accesses to be passed to toolstack support programs. > > * In some configurations, Xen PV domains do not have a suitable > longrunning service process to handle requests of this kind. > > * MSR reads of this kind might be expected to be fast but if they > involve trapping to a service domain they might be very slow. I have no objection to specifying that these reads may be quite slow. Guests should only use them at b...

...interface based purely on MSRs makes that > difficult in a number of ways: > > * Currently I don't think there is any way in Xen to cause MSR > accesses to be passed to toolstack support programs. > > * In some configurations, Xen PV domains do not have a suitable > longrunning service process to handle requests of this kind. > > * MSR reads of this kind might be expected to be fast but if they > involve trapping to a service domain they might be very slow. I have no objection to specifying that these reads may be quite slow. Guests should only use them at b...

Hi, I'm working on a runtime autotuner that utilizes ORCv2 JIT (I'm closely tracking tip-of-tree), so linking new object files and patching in the new function(s) will happen frequently. One of the concerns my runtime system has is the ability to do one of the following: (1) replacement of the contents of a JITDylib with a new object file [to provide semi-space GC-style reclaiming], (2)

All- With suggestions from Ian and previous posts on this list, I''ve been investigating why Xen causes a Transmeta-based system to reboot immediately.. I''ve added instrumentation to xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_32.S (a collection of ''.asciz "foo"'' statements) hoping to locate a point of failure.. and it dies sometime before this code is run.. At what point

I was trying to install ferret 0.9.2 on solaris (SunOS 5.8) which does not have a sys/dir.h nix_io.c:5:21: sys/dir.h: No such file or directory make: *** [nix_io.o] Error 1 I couldn''t find an obvious way around this... any suggestions? Thanks, Rich Marisa Cornell Information Technologies Cornell University

Here's a draft CommonHV spec. It's also on github: https://github.com/amluto/CommonHV So far, this provides a two-way RNG interface, a way to detect it, and a way to detect other hypervisor leaves. The latter is because, after both the enormous public thread and some private discussions, it seems that detection of existing CPUID paravirt leaves is annoying and inefficient. If