search for: lon_kernel_c

...criptor and load boot GDT */ > + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax > + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) > + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) > + > + /* GDT loaded - switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ > + pushq $__KERNEL_CS > + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax > + pushq %rax > + lretq > + > +.Lon_kernel_cs: > + UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY I would suggest fixing at least SS as well.

...; --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S > @@ -393,6 +393,14 @@ SYM_CODE_START(startup_64) > addq %rax, 2(%rax) > lgdt (%rax) > > + /* Reload CS so IRET returns to a CS actually in the GDT */ > + pushq $__KERNEL_CS > + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax > + pushq %rax > + lretq > + > +.Lon_kernel_cs: > + > /* > * paging_prepare() sets up the trampoline and checks if we need to > * enable 5-level paging. > -- So I'm thinking I should take this one even now on the grounds that it sanitizes CS to...

...low */ leaq (__end_init_task - SIZEOF_PTREGS)(%rip), %rsp + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) + + /* GDT loaded - switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ + pushq $__KERNEL_CS + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax + pushq %rax + lretq + +.Lon_kernel_cs: + UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY + /* Sanitize CPU configuration */ call verify_cpu @@ -480,6 +494,18 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) +/* Boot GDT used...

...S index 4f7e6b84be07..6b11060c3a0f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S @@ -393,6 +393,14 @@ SYM_CODE_START(startup_64) addq %rax, 2(%rax) lgdt (%rax) + /* Reload CS so IRET returns to a CS actually in the GDT */ + pushq $__KERNEL_CS + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax + pushq %rax + lretq + +.Lon_kernel_cs: + /* * paging_prepare() sets up the trampoline and checks if we need to * enable 5-level paging. -- 2.17.1

...gdt(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, boot_gdt_base(%rip) + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) + + /* New GDT is live - reload data segment registers */ + movl $__KERNEL_DS, %eax + movl %eax, %ds + movl %eax, %ss + movl %eax, %es + + /* Now switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ + pushq $__KERNEL_CS + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax + pushq %rax + lretq + +.Lon_kernel_cs: + UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY + /* Sanitize CPU configuration */ call verify_cpu @@ -480,6 +500,22 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) +/* Boot GDT used...

...(%rip), %rax + movq %rax, boot_gdt_descr+2(%rip) + lgdt boot_gdt_descr(%rip) + + /* New GDT is live - reload data segment registers */ + movl $__KERNEL_DS, %eax + movl %eax, %ds + movl %eax, %ss + movl %eax, %es + + /* Now switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ + pushq $__KERNEL_CS + leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax + pushq %rax + lretq + +.Lon_kernel_cs: + UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY + /* Sanitize CPU configuration */ call verify_cpu @@ -143,6 +163,11 @@ SYM_CODE_START(secondary_startup_64) 1: UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY + /* Setup boot GDT descriptor and load boot GDT */ + leaq boot_gdt(%rip), %rax + mov...

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:41PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > @@ -480,6 +500,22 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) > SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) > > +/* Boot GDT used when kernel addresses are not mapped yet */ > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_descr, .word boot_gdt_end - boot_gdt) >

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:41PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > @@ -480,6 +500,22 @@ SYM_DATA_LOCAL(early_gdt_descr_base, .quad INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(gdt_page)) > SYM_DATA(phys_base, .quad 0x0) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_base) > > +/* Boot GDT used when kernel addresses are not mapped yet */ > +SYM_DATA_LOCAL(boot_gdt_descr, .word boot_gdt_end - boot_gdt) >

...be + * setup again after the switch to kernel addresses. The address read + * from initial_gs is a kernel address, so it needs to be adjusted first + * for the identity mapping. + */ + movl $MSR_GS_BASE,%ecx + /* Now switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ pushq $__KERNEL_CS leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax -- 2.27.0

...be + * setup again after the switch to kernel addresses. The address read + * from initial_gs is a kernel address, so it needs to be adjusted first + * for the identity mapping. + */ + movl $MSR_GS_BASE,%ecx + /* Now switch to __KERNEL_CS so IRET works reliably */ pushq $__KERNEL_CS leaq .Lon_kernel_cs(%rip), %rax -- 2.28.0

...include <asm/sev-es.h> /* * Manage page tables very early on. diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S index 4622940134a5..12bf6f11fd83 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S @@ -95,6 +95,13 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(startup_64) .Lon_kernel_cs: UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY + /* Setup IDT - Needed for SEV-ES */ + pushq %rsi + /* early_idt_setup - physbase as first parameter */ + leaq _text(%rip), %rdi + call early_idt_setup + popq %rsi + /* Sanitize CPU configuration */ call verify_cpu @@ -363,6 +370,33 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(early_idt_h...

...d_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include <asm/processor-flags.h> #include <asm/asm-offsets.h> #include <asm/bootparam.h> +#include <asm/desc_defs.h> #include "pgtable.h" /* @@ -401,6 +402,10 @@ SYM_CODE_START(startup_64) .Lon_kernel_cs: + pushq %rsi + call load_stage1_idt + popq %rsi + /* * paging_prepare() sets up the trampoline and checks if we need to * enable 5-level paging. @@ -528,6 +533,13 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(.Lrelocated) shrq $3, %rcx rep stosq +/* + * Load stage2 IDT + */ + pushq %rsi + call...

Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.

Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a rebased version of the latest SEV-ES patches. They are now based on latest tip/master instead of upstream Linux and include the necessary changes. Changes to v4 are in particular: - Moved early IDT setup code to idt.c, because the idt_descr and the idt_table are now static - This required to make stack protector work early (or

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the new version of the SEV-ES client enabling patch-set. It is based on the latest tip/master branch and contains the necessary changes. In particular those ar: - Enabling CR4.FSGSBASE early on supported processors so that early #VC exceptions on APs can be handled. - Add another patch (patch 1) to fix a KVM frame-size build

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and rebased the code v5.8-rc5. The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the #VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big pile of entry code changes merged into