search for: lokoed

Hi ! I cant add any user (person, and machine) to my domain made with samba-3.0.1, openldap-2.0.27, new samba.schema, smbldap-tools-0.8.3. I have to migrate from ldap_compact to ldap backend. Rhea is a ldap server, codo is a PDC from DOMAIN. To show, what the problem is, look at the following instructions: root@rhea:~# smbldap-useradd -w loko20 root@rhea:~# getent passwd|grep loko

Our goal is to have a particular DC which will be used by our proxy for user authentication. We tried to use only the required DC as a nameserver but that doesn't work, queries are still sent to other DCs. Michel

Hi Under what conditon does samba switch between domain controllers ? Are there any special conditions or situations in which samba decides to use  "DC B" rather than  "DC A" ? In my case samba switches very often. Thanks, Michel

Hi, I am running samba/winbind 4.2.14 on Debian 8 which is joined to an Active Directory and would like to know if you have any idea with my issue. In my case, ntlm authentification is enabled in squid (proxy). Here is the problem that I am facing : "wbinfo -t" takes sometimes more than 30 secondes to display the result. For some reason, the server loses it's connection to the

I''m getting an odd kernel panic which I cannot get the whole error for, I believe it has something to do with a designation for the root filesystem. About the time it would be mounting the root filesystem, there is a kernel panic and it reboots less than 1 second later. I have lokoed around for dmesg logs and tried using the magic PAUSE, but with no luck. Recommendations? I followed the tutorial at: http://wiki.blitzed.org/User:grifferz/Xen and apparently didn''t pray enough. Would like to give more detail on this but am a bit limited with the 1 second window :)...

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:04:06 +0100 LOKO MESO Michel <mmeso at olfeo.com> wrote: > Here is my smb.conf : > > [global] > workgroup = MY > netbios name = sd01 > realm = my.domain > server string = Olfeo Samba Server > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > max log size = 50 > security = ADS > encrypt passwords = yes > ;  smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:36:43 +0100 LOKO MESO Michel <mmeso at olfeo.com> wrote: > In my case samba is not a domain controller and the server is joined > to an Active Directory. > Users don't need to login locally. > > Are the 'idmap config' not useful with an Active Directory ? Quite the contrary, they are mandatory, just because your users don't login

On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:00:12 +0100 LOKO MESO Michel <mmeso at olfeo.com> wrote: > Thank you for your response. > > My server (debian) is joined to an AD and I'm trying to understand > how the communication between the two servers works. > > Does winbind check  the response time of the DCs before switching to > the  fastest ? Is it possible to specify which DC

Hi, I am running samba/winbind 4.8.9 on Debian 8 which is joined to an Active Directory and facing the following issue : I need to specify a particular DC for the authentification. Therefor I added 'password server = x.x.x.x' in /etc/samba/smb.conf but realised that the option is ignored and that the requests are sent to another DC. In which case does Samba ignore 'password

On 15/05/2019 09:08, LOKO MESO Michel wrote: > Yes, our DCs are equal but we added a new one that will only be used > by the server where samba is installed. This is where it gets difficult, I get the feeling that the original DC's are Windows DC's, not that this matters. By default, All domain members (including DC's) are in the 'Default-First-Site-Name' site and

I have been trying to throw away my dependence on Windoz since the early Pentium era, but there always seems to be some essential application that can't be replaced. Currently it is the programs that read my blood glucose meeter and an athletic trainer system. Both of them communicate through a serial port. I am currently working on getting the trainer going. It loads fine and has no

> Simple, it's only a NAS device, and not really a file server / web > server / data base server as well. Here is something I am currently lokoing at, and wondering if you'd considered it or if anyone here has done it. I've got a bunch of existing hardware - really good IBM stuff that is all installed with CentOS (with a few exceptions). We want to move to virtualization, but