search for: lohoff

...00000 ffffffff c23645e0 c68224c8 Call Trace: [prune_dcache+295/360] [shrink_dcache_parent+23/48] [permission+32/56] [lookup_dentry+365/504] [vfs_rmdir+254/308] [filldir+0/136] [sys_rmdir+173/268] [system_call+52/56] Code: 8b 47 08 3d 2b 2f c3 a5 0f 85 be 01 00 00 f6 46 05 01 0f 85 -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

Hi, i think this message should be removed ;) paradigm:~# umount /mnt2 paradigm:~# mkdosfs /dev/fd0 mkdosfs 2.5 (07 Jan 2000) paradigm:~# /tmp/syslinux /dev/fd0 paradigm:~# sync paradigm:~# mount /dev/fd0 /mnt2 VFS: Can't find an ext3 filesystem on dev fd(2,0). Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

Hi Aki, On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:26:30AM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 05.09.2017 14:39, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Hi, > > i am running basically this from cron: > > > > /usr/bin/doveadm -v expunge -u * mailbox INBOX.Spam SENTBEFORE 90d > > /usr/bin/doveadm -v expunge -u * mailbox INBOX.Trash SENTBEFORE 90d > > /usr/bin/doveadm -v expunge -u * mailbox INBOX.Junk SE...

...68. No syslog/Output whatsoever. I tried running with -vvv -D which gives me a lot of output (for all mailboxes) but still i am unable to pinpoint the problem. The later 2 commands return "0" as expected. Where does the error return code come from and what does 68 mean? Flo -- Florian Lohoff f at zz.de UTF-8 Test: The ? ran after a ?, but the ? ran away -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 828 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL:...

...[2015/01/09 15:21:46.332434, 2] ../source3/passdb/pdb_ldap.c:524(init_sam_from_ldap) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: flo [2015/01/09 15:21:46.333609, 2] ../source3/passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2311(init_group_from_ldap) init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 1000 Hints? Flo -- Florian Lohoff f at zz.de We need to self-defense - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 828 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL:...

...96653 -96654 Fix? yes Free inodes count wrong for group #6 (14261, counted=14263). Fix? yes Free inodes count wrong (114098, counted=114100). Fix? yes /dev/hda8: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***** /dev/hda8: 14668/128768 files (5.1% non-contiguous), 191319/257032 blocks [...] Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

...features fsck.ext3: Filesystem has unsupported read-only feature(s) while checking ext3 journal for /dev/hda6 Segmentation fault When removing the rootfs fsck everything works as expected. debugfs never shows interesting features ... has_journal, sparse_super, filetype. Ideas ? Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

...c014ca25 <journal_write_metadata_buffer+5d/1d8> 10: 75 2d jne 3f <_EIP+0x3f> c014ca54 <journal_write_metadata_buffer+8c/1d8> Code; c014ca27 <journal_write_metadata_buffer+5f/1d8> 12: 83 c4 00 add $0x0,%esp Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

...mov %eax,%ebx Code; c0133cb7 <iput+23/228> 10: 85 db test %ebx,%ebx Code; c0133cb9 <iput+25/228> 12: 74 10 je 24 <_EIP+0x24> c0133ccb <iput+37/228> 1 warning issued. Results may not be reliable. -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

...les (0.8% non-contiguous), 92277/257032 blocks [...] This is 2.2.19 + ide/udma patches + ext3 patches on an ThinkPad T21 00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) (prog-if 80 [Master]) hda: IBM-DJSA-232, 30520MB w/1874kB Cache, CHS=4134/240/63, UDMA(33) Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

On 05.09.2017 14:39, Florian Lohoff wrote: > Hi, > i am running basically this from cron: > > /usr/bin/doveadm -v expunge -u * mailbox INBOX.Spam SENTBEFORE 90d > /usr/bin/doveadm -v expunge -u * mailbox INBOX.Trash SENTBEFORE 90d > /usr/bin/doveadm -v expunge -u * mailbox INBOX.Junk SENTBEFORE 90d > > Now i a...

....01/0/0.48, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via wasteland service) Jan 22 10:37:37 pax postfix/qmgr[9371]: B2B0F1000FF: removed So even postfix found the message id to be truncated. Does dovecot have a "broken maildir mail storage mail dictionary" for automated tests? Flo -- Florian Lohoff f at zz.de UTF-8 Test: The ? ran after a ?, but the ? ran away -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https...

...Dec 12 16:49:26 2001 Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root) Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root) First inode: 11 Inode size: 128 Journal UUID: <none> Journal inode: 1054 Journal device: 0x0000 First orphan inode: 0 Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

An ext3 update which also applies to linux-2.4.16 is available at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ Quite a lot of miscellany here. It would be appreciated if interested parties could please test it in preparation for sending upstream. Thanks. Changelog: - Merged several ext2 sync-up patches from Christoph Hellwig - Drop the big kernel lock across the call to block_prepare_write.

Conclusion: DO NOT USE SOFTWARE RAID-1 WITH EXT3 I've started with this conclusion cause i am positive that raid-1 and ext3 are causing data corruption. I've upgraded from 7.1 to 7.2 and from the first date i run into data corruption problems @ least once per day (i was monitoring once per day only) after 7 days we bought a brand new server cause the previous was very old and i thought