search for: logicaldylibs

...2b8..4aa3362 100644 --- a/CompileOnDemandLayer.h +++ b/CompileOnDemandLayer.h @@ -429,6 +429,28 @@ private: return CalledAddr; } +public: + TargetAddress updatePointer(std::string FuncName, TargetAddress FnBodyAddr) { + //Find out which logical dylib contains our symbol + auto LDI = LogicalDylibs.begin(); + for (auto LDE = LogicalDylibs.end(); LDI != LDE; ++LDI) { + if (auto LMResources = LDI->getLogicalModuleResourcesForSymbol(FuncName, false)) { + Module &SrcM = LMResources->SourceModule->getResource(); + std::string CalledFnName = mangle(FuncN...

...t;> @@ -429,6 +429,28 @@ private: >> return CalledAddr; >> } >> >> +public: >> + TargetAddress updatePointer(std::string FuncName, TargetAddress >> FnBodyAddr) { >> + //Find out which logical dylib contains our symbol >> + auto LDI = LogicalDylibs.begin(); >> + for (auto LDE = LogicalDylibs.end(); LDI != LDE; ++LDI) { >> + if (auto LMResources = >> LDI->getLogicalModuleResourcesForSymbol(FuncName, false)) { >> + Module &SrcM = LMResources->SourceModule->getResource(); >> +...

...> +++ b/CompileOnDemandLayer.h > @@ -429,6 +429,28 @@ private: > return CalledAddr; > } > > +public: > + TargetAddress updatePointer(std::string FuncName, TargetAddress > FnBodyAddr) { > + //Find out which logical dylib contains our symbol > + auto LDI = LogicalDylibs.begin(); > + for (auto LDE = LogicalDylibs.end(); LDI != LDE; ++LDI) { > + if (auto LMResources = > LDI->getLogicalModuleResourcesForSymbol(FuncName, false)) { > + Module &SrcM = LMResources->SourceModule->getResource(); > + std::string Ca...

...ate: >>> return CalledAddr; >>> } >>> >>> +public: >>> + TargetAddress updatePointer(std::string FuncName, TargetAddress >>> FnBodyAddr) { >>> + //Find out which logical dylib contains our symbol >>> + auto LDI = LogicalDylibs.begin(); >>> + for (auto LDE = LogicalDylibs.end(); LDI != LDE; ++LDI) { >>> + if (auto LMResources = >>> LDI->getLogicalModuleResourcesForSymbol(FuncName, false)) { >>> + Module &SrcM = LMResources->SourceModule->getResource();...

...n CalledAddr; >>>> } >>>> >>>> +public: >>>> + TargetAddress updatePointer(std::string FuncName, TargetAddress >>>> FnBodyAddr) { >>>> + //Find out which logical dylib contains our symbol >>>> + auto LDI = LogicalDylibs.begin(); >>>> + for (auto LDE = LogicalDylibs.end(); LDI != LDE; ++LDI) { >>>> + if (auto LMResources = >>>> LDI->getLogicalModuleResourcesForSymbol(FuncName, false)) { >>>> + Module &SrcM = LMResources->SourceModule-&gt...

...::orc::SimpleCompiler>, std::function<std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module>(std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module>)> >; CompileCallbackMgrT = llvm::orc::JITCompileCallbackManager; IndirectStubsMgrT = llvm::orc::IndirectStubsManager; llvm::orc::VModuleKey = long unsigned int]: Assertion `I != LogicalDylibs.end() && "VModuleKey K not valid here"' failed. 1) Can 0 ever be a valid VModuleKey? How can one reliably detect an invalid VModuleKey? 2) Secondly it seems to me that following the assertion there should be a check so that the code dosn't continue? It is causing segment...

...n Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 22:15, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 1) Can 0 ever be a valid VModuleKey? How can one reliably detect an invalid VModuleKey? > > > I believe 0 was a valid VModuleKey in ORCv1. The assertion is checking the the VModuleKey is present in the LogicalDylibs map. That means that you have to have used that key in an addModule call, e.g.: > > CODLayer.addModule(K, std::move(M)); > > and not subsequently removed the key with a call to removeModule. Yes indeed that is what happened. So to prevent that I need to check if VModuleKey was ever ini...