search for: logamount

550.ipfwlimit check in /etc/periodic/security takes into account only global/default verbosity limit and does not account for a specific logging limit set for a particular rule e.g.: $ ipfw -a l | fgrep log 65000 *521* 41764 deny log logamount *1000* ip from any to any $ sysctl -n net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit *100* >From security run output: ipfw log limit reached: 65000 519 41672 deny log logamount 1000 ip from any to any -- Andriy Gapon

I have a FreeBSD box acting as a firewall and NAT gateway I would like to set it up to transparently pass IPSec packets -- I have an IPSec VPN client running on another machine, connecting to a remote network. Is there a way to do this? I can't find any hints in the man pages.

...les will match this one and hence >> > be logged and denied. Is this not correct? >> >>That's correct. Aren't you seeing any? Try show rather than tell. > >Showing: > ># ipfw -a -S -N -t list >00100 688 173384 Thu Dec 20 15:32:17 2007 set 0 allow log logamount > 10 ip from any to any via lo0 >00200 0 0 set 0 deny log logamount 10 > ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >00300 0 0 set 0 deny log logamount 10 > ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >00400 4344 1712050 Fri Dec 21 00:23:37 2007 se...

Dear W.D. Do you understand that by adding the rules into kernel space numbered from zero to sixty five thousand five hundred thirty four you may alter the behavior of the rule number sixty five thousand five hundred thirty five can you please define and list the goals you are trying to achieve by altering default rule in the terms you can both explain and understand. ----- Original Message

...om any to any dst-port 138 in via vr0 01322 4 192 deny tcp from any to any dst-port 139 in via vr0 01323 3 144 deny tcp from any to any dst-port 81 in via vr0 01330 0 0 deny ip from any to any frag in via vr0 01350 362 71038 deny tcp from any to any established in via vr0 01400 2879 346276 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any in via vr0 01450 0 0 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any out via vr0 01800 8049 1944267 divert 8668 ip from any to any out via vr0 01801 14676 5695755 allow ip from any to any 01999 0 0 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any 65535 758 727615 deny ip from any to any pl...

Hi peeps, After compiling ipfw into the new 6.2 kernel, and typing "ipfw list", all I get is: "65535 deny ip from any to any" From reading the docs, this might indicate that this is the default rule. (I am certainly protected this way--but can't be very productive ;^) ) By the way, when I run "man ipfw" I get nothing. Using this instead:

...ee in releng/7 something that I did not see in releng/6 - even if I use a file with custom rules in firewall_type I still get default loopback rules installed. I think that this is not correct, I am using custom rules exactly because I want to control *everything* (e.g. all deny rules come with log logamount xxx). -- Andriy Gapon

...39;^[[:digit:]]\+[[:space:]]\+[[:digit:]]\+' | \ - awk -v limit="$IPFW_LOG_LIMIT" \ - '{if ($2 > limit) {print $0}}' > ${TMP} + ipfw -a l | grep " log " \ + | \ + awk -v limit="$IPFW_LOG_LIMIT" -v logamount=$6 \ + '{if ($5 == "logamount") {if ($2 > logamount) {print $0} } else { if ($2 > limit) {print $0} } }' > ${TMP} if [ -s "${TMP}" ]; then rc=1 echo "" =============================>8========...

In my recent security email, I got the following errors: cantona.dnswatchdog.com login failures: Aug 20 02:37:19 cantona sshd[9444]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted Aug 20 04:30:42 cantona sshd[16142]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted Aug 20 21:21:51 cantona sshd[45716]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted So three questions: What is it? Should I be worried?

...mp; Log all setup of tcp incoming connections from the outside ## add 00770 deny log tcp from any to any setup in via bge0 ## Reject all port 80 http packets that fall through to here ## add 00780 deny tcp from any to any 80 out via bge0 ## Everything else is denied by default ## add 00790 deny log logamount 500 all from any to any Thanks Nick

...201 to 200 packets per second [...] where fxp0 is an external interface. What could involve such a messages? In /var/log/messages the above strings was prepended by string: Feb 10 13:24:29 gw /kernel: ipfw: limit 100 reached on entry 10800 current ipfw #10800 entry says: 10800 1204 52976 deny log logamount 100 ip from any to 172.16.0.0/12 via fxp0 /var/log/security at this time shows many strings looking like this: Feb 10 13:24:29 gw /kernel: ipfw: 10800 Deny TCP 11.22.33.44:1376 172.29.249.249:7 out via fxp0 11.22.33.44 is my fxp0 iface address. I do not think I have tried to initiate such a conn...

Hi There, I've been having an issue trying to figure out a way to policy route outbound packets from a multihomed machine through the proper interface using IPFW to no avail. I've tried several different incantations of IPFW fwd/forward statements, and none of them seem to do the trick. Basically, I have a host that has multiple Internet connections. This host is running FreeBSD 4.9